Grasse a great biologist/zoologist??? and a knock for salty

I am very much impressed with your clairvoyance. salty

Go to Retired Service | The University of Vermont There you will find a list of all except my most recent papers as well as reprints of three published papers dealing with evolution . You will also find the unpublished Manifesto which sets forth my views in greater detail. salty

M. As usual your reasoning is at fault. Evolution is not a theory. It is a fact. Darwinism also is not a theory. It is the most unsubstantiated hypothesis in the history of science. My papers determine my position. Where is your published position on evolution? Keep up the insulting tone. It suits you perfectly. salty

You are a great asset to us antiDarwinians, Speaking of unsupported hypotheses, Darwinism has been unsupported now for 144 years. The semi-meiotic hypothesis, which is at least testable, has only been around for 19 years. I love the way you rant and rave. I only wonder why. Keep it up as it is music to my ears. salty

A mystic is someone who believes, usually devoutly, in forces that have never been demonstrated. In short, a Darwinian is a mystic.

Not one matter of substance in my papers has been questioned in the published literature or in this or other forums. The simple fact is that you and many others don't like my conclusions. That is just too bad. Darwinism remains a disaster as an explanatory hypothesis. I have offered an alternative which at least recognizes the facts from cytogenetics, developmental biology, paleontology and most important sex determination and the independent origin of the germ cells. None of this can be acommodated in the Darwinian model. You accuse me of errors but have not produced any. Keep up the great work. I love it so! salty

You too are possessed of special powers. A great many scientists including Mayr, Gould, Dawkins, Provine and many others are very much aware of my papers. Their failure to recognize the significance of my position indicates to me that they choose to ignore that to which they are unable to respond without abandoning their own bias. You go right on ridiculing the facts on which my work rests, because that is exactly what you are and have been doing. I remain confident of the total bankruptcy of the Darwinian fable as well as the soundness of the semi-meiotic hypothesis. If I felt otherwise I would never have published. All you and other members of this forum have done is to engage in personal assault and deprecation. I recommend you read the conclusion to M.J.D. White's "Animal cytology and evolution" pages 764 on. After you have, ask yourself could these differences conceivably have arisen through sexual reproduction? The answer, since I am confident you won't follow my instructions, is no. Keep up the insults. salty

Since you refer to Terry as a worm I see no need to enlighten you about what it means to be a Darwinist. salty

M if you had read the manifesto you would realize I already had summed it up. Check the section on the evidence from cytology. I didn't expect you to go to the library. Heaven forbid. Why must you describe yourself as a moron? I'm sure you are at least a cut above that. salty