Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Peanut Gallery for the Keys/RAZD Debate
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 6 of 57 (406181)
06-17-2007 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Percy
06-17-2007 10:18 AM


lol
Resting under a tree would be dangerous because one would risk bombardment by acorns and being buried under leaves.
Better not fall asleep in the field and get covered in vines. Could put Lilliput to shame ...
OR this is how those ancient humans attained such great biblical age - they also hyper-aged. In which case what is a year? And if we are now talking hyper-years in the bible now compared to modern years, then the actual age of the universe etc is even younger than 6000 years and we start all over again ...
Thanks.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Percy, posted 06-17-2007 10:18 AM Percy has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 10 of 57 (406202)
06-17-2007 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Percy
06-17-2007 3:30 PM


The problems with accelerated time scales
A fun thread in it's own write ...
And about bees,...
Supersonic wing speeds? What about dragonflies (what is the fastest bug?)?
We also have the problem that if radioactivity didn't operate then, then there must have been a period of super-radioactivity to produce the daughter elements in the proportions we see, and what would this do to the amount of material needed to reach critical mass and how does THAT compare with the size of deposits found? Kaboomed or not?
Edited by RAZD, : sp

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Percy, posted 06-17-2007 3:30 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Son Goku, posted 06-20-2007 1:23 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 20 of 57 (406291)
06-18-2007 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by PMOC
06-18-2007 4:40 PM


Re: Where do you find the patience..
Welcome to the fray PMOC
Where do you find the patience to deal with someone who just proffers ridiculous statements without evidence ...
The goal is not to convert the opponent, that is wishful thinking in most cases, rather the goal is to educate those reading the thread that are not aware of the facts, the arguments and the thinking that goes into the sciences. The goal is to reach the next generation before they get solidified in their denial of reality.
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by PMOC, posted 06-18-2007 4:40 PM PMOC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by PMOC, posted 06-18-2007 9:34 PM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 35 of 57 (407269)
06-25-2007 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by iceage
06-24-2007 9:05 PM


Re: Countable Rings
Note that the 1974 date is a typo, it should be 1964 (this date is given on other sources). See reference 33, published in 1965. Hard to do that for a 1974 cutting...
Not sure why RAZD did not reply directly to Simple here ...
Information is already covered a couple of times: he just keeps repeating his mistaken impressions. Keeps saying stuff is not given when it is. Keeps mixing up occasional missing rings (as a known source of error in dendrochronology) with the rings missing at the beginning of the Prometheus growth.
As Percy notes this kind of denial of reality is frustrating in it's completeness: anything that contradicts his fantasy does not occur in his dream world. He will also flip and flop on position without any concern that what he says contradicts what he said earlier. He is shameless.
Thanks
Enjoy.

Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by iceage, posted 06-24-2007 9:05 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by iceage, posted 06-26-2007 12:46 AM RAZD has not replied
 Message 38 by jar, posted 06-26-2007 1:12 AM RAZD has not replied
 Message 41 by kbertsche, posted 06-27-2007 12:00 AM RAZD has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 43 of 57 (407746)
06-28-2007 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Percy
06-28-2007 9:14 AM


Re: Simple's Misinterpretation
The missing neutrinos were found a few years ago when it was discovered that some of the neutrinos generated by the sun's nuclear processes can flip to a different neutrino type on their way to the earth, and this other neutrino type wasn't one that our instruments were set up to detect. Once we modified the instrumentation, there the missing neutrinos were.
I was looking for some cite on this. Wikipedia was not helpful, although it addressed part of the issue. Do you have a link I can use?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Percy, posted 06-28-2007 9:14 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Coragyps, posted 06-28-2007 11:22 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 45 of 57 (407763)
06-28-2007 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by Coragyps
06-28-2007 11:22 AM


Re: Simple's Misinterpretation
Thanks. Found enough in wiki for simple.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Coragyps, posted 06-28-2007 11:22 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024