How can "Creationism" be supported?

Does this apply to evolution as well? Why is explaining the universe through a scientific approach "unfortunate"?Creationism explanation of scientifc evidence compared alongside of evolutionary explanations of the same data are far superior. Of course this is why I am a Creationist. Why would any Creationist or person accept naturalism filtered explanations since they predetermine the interpretation and conclusion?Science uses supernaturalism suppositions because the world looks designed and that observation indicates invisible Designer. Why would any Christian object to this logic?RayEdited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.

In a previous topic I argued that Creationism is supported scientifically by the overwhelming observation of design seen in nature. Of course the entire claim is based upon the assumption that 'observation' is the cornerstone of science and the logic that design indicates invisible Designer.In reply, I might add, evolutionists special plead: design does not indicate invisible Designer. So in this respect the evolutionists and their counterintuitive "logic" best correspond to Young Earth Creationism belief that appearance of great age does not indicate great age, more special pleading. This is why I am an Old Earth Creationist-Designist (but accept a young biosphere).Ray

Straightforward logic says there is no difference. Evolutionists do not agree that design indicates invisible Designer. You already agreed that the appearance of design exists.Ray