Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Descent of testicles.
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 4.1


Message 6 of 55 (446814)
01-07-2008 10:05 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by MartinV
01-07-2008 9:29 AM


Martin, you say;
The whole phenomenon can be observed in females too - descent of ovaries during evolution. But of course it is not as aparent and manifest as in males.
If the process was directed (and you neglect to mention who your director might be, but I think I get the hint) then why lower the ovaries at all? Why not descend the testicles and leave the ovaries where they were? Of course, if the whole business evolved, it might make sense...

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by MartinV, posted 01-07-2008 9:29 AM MartinV has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by MartinV, posted 01-07-2008 11:01 AM Granny Magda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 4.1


Message 25 of 55 (446928)
01-07-2008 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by MartinV
01-07-2008 11:01 AM


MartinV writes:
Granny writes:
If the process was directed (and you neglect to mention who your director might be, but I think I get the hint) then why lower the ovaries at all? Why not descend the testicles and leave the ovaries where they were? Of course, if the whole business evolved, it might make sense...
I don't see your point. The process of polarization involved both sexes.
My point it simply that if the human body were designed, then there would be no need for the designer to cause both ovaries and testes to descend, when he only intended to affect testes.
Both organs displaying similar properties suggests that they both evolved under the influence of the same basic adaptation.
By the way, this "process of polarization" that you mention has been part of our basic phenotype since the evolution of the flatworm. This is why you don't see organisms with a head at each end.
Incidentally, if you think that external testes are such a poor model, what makes you think that they were designed? Unless, of course, you think that they were designed by an idiot.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by MartinV, posted 01-07-2008 11:01 AM MartinV has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024