Just wanted to ask about one other point.
Modern Theory of Evolution says that species evolve.
I would think that examples such as descent of testicles would actually be a pretty strong supporting evidence that the Theory is correct and that Design or Direction are refuted.
Since in the real world we do NOT see good ideas or effective features show up across species, it seems to me that the idea that species evolve independently is supported. We do not see external testicles on all species, instead we do see external testicles on fairly closely related species.
What we seem to see when we look at lifeforms is that if some feature does not prevent reproduction, if the critter is good enough to get by, it does. If for any reason, some feature provides an advantage in reproduction it will soon out reproduce them critters lacking the feature and so become a dominate trait.
BUT...
nowhere in lifeforms do we find examples of design or direction such as we see in engineered objects.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!