Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 14.0
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 129 of 134 (450742)
01-23-2008 1:04 PM


NJ and the gay marriage thread
I don't want to get to involved in this argument, but I will say that I did not consider this appropriate;
Nemesis Juggernaut writes:
Just like it would be discriminatory for you to have barred Oscar Wilde from marrying his true love? If you're going to make an emotive argument, you have to be real careful that the tables don't turn on you.
From Message 53
In the original post, the name "Oscar Wilde" turns out to be a link to the North American Man-Boy Love Association. When I do someone the courtesy of looking up a link that they are using as part of there argument, I don't expect to find myself on a paedophile apologist website. Most people make do with Wikipedia.
NJ clearly should have made it obvious what that link was. I have no wish to give NAMBLA more hits. It is all the more pathetic, given that it was basically a childish stunt, aimed at irritating the opposition. Someone of NJ's age and intelligence really should know better, especially since he has admin status.
I notice that the offensive link is still there, whilst the wholly inoffensive picture of three gay men enjoying a bit of harmless fun, has been hidden.

Mutate and Survive

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by teen4christ, posted 01-23-2008 1:15 PM Granny Magda has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024