Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Digital Life Design—What a concept!
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2672 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 4 of 13 (451241)
01-26-2008 9:41 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Wounded King
01-26-2008 8:18 PM


I wouldn't say Venter has quite made good on his claims though, its not so much that the new genome has been digitally designed as plagiarised after all.
Fair enough. Even Venter admits that.
But while we can create and develop new species, we're not creating life from scratch.
P. 51, Life: What a Concept!.
But these are important notions that get lost in the over-simplified interpretation of what we are doing. I don't think we are creating life. We're coming up with new modified life forms, and we should be able to go from the digital world right to the analog world in the computer, and we have a team working on a program to do that, designing a species in the computer.
P. 53, Life: What a Concept!.
He also makes a point of calling his genome "synthetic", not "artificial".
Still and all. Pretty spiffy. And synthetic chromosomes + genome transfer ...
A short while ago we published a paper in Science on genome transportation, where we took a purified chromosome from one species, made sure it was totally devoid of any protein, and put that chromosome into another bacterial species, and it's the ultimate identity theft because the new chromosome we put in completely took over the cell, and the cell converted completely into the cell dictated by the new chromosome. the new chromosome dictated everything. All the proteins changed over to that. The phenotype of the cell, everything changed, converted from the old species into the new species.
P. 48, Life: What a Concept!.
... = extra spiffy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Wounded King, posted 01-26-2008 8:18 PM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Fosdick, posted 01-26-2008 9:59 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2672 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 7 of 13 (451262)
01-26-2008 11:27 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Fosdick
01-26-2008 9:59 PM


Re: Spiffy!
Should I assume then that the functional core of biological life is digital, rather than analog?
To the extent that it relies on DNA (or RNA), yes.
Do you honestly not understand the digital nature of DNA or are you trolling again?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Fosdick, posted 01-26-2008 9:59 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Fosdick, posted 01-27-2008 11:38 AM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024