You admit you are a scientific illiterate, yet you think you are qualified to declare that one of the most widely accepted "scientific theories" in the world is inconsistent with one of the most widely accepted "laws."
Which do you think is more likely: that your criticism is based on a faulty understanding of one or both, or people who have studied and worked with both for all of their professional lives got them wrong?
{ABE}
By the way, it's "thermodynamics." You'll have a little bit more credibility if you at least know what it's called.
Edited by subbie, : As stated
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat