Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fish on the Ark?
Percy
Member
Posts: 22509
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 80 of 91 (464412)
04-25-2008 1:01 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by 1071
04-25-2008 12:13 PM


Re: Hydroplate theory
antiLIE writes:
I think the fish died during the flood by the hot water and massive disruption of sediment (buried in mud) from the fountains of the deep breaking up. In other words Walt Brown's Hydroplate theory. There are several theories on the great deluge and catastrophology, but from what I have seen thus far, this one explains the fish dying the best.
You're making less and less credible your claims not to be a creationist. How is your paper trail at EvC Forum any less contradictory than someone saying, for example, "I accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. What's that? Am I a Christian? No, of course not, why do you ask?"
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by 1071, posted 04-25-2008 12:13 PM 1071 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by 1071, posted 04-25-2008 1:09 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22509
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 82 of 91 (464445)
04-25-2008 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by 1071
04-25-2008 1:09 PM


Re: Hydroplate theory
antiLIE writes:
I am a creationists. I really am not understandeing your post.
Wasn't it you who in another thread said, when it was suggested you were a creationist, responded something like, "I never claimed to be a creationist."
If I've got this right, then it is nice to finally have a clear statement from you.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by 1071, posted 04-25-2008 1:09 PM 1071 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by 1071, posted 04-25-2008 3:59 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22509
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 84 of 91 (464458)
04-25-2008 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by 1071
04-25-2008 3:59 PM


Re: Hydroplate theory
Oh, okay. But I'm still not sure I understand your position, because what I see contains a significant contradiction. On the one hand you say you believe neither creationism nor evolution is science, but on the other hand you've offered scientific arguments in support of creationist positions, e.g., hydroplate theory in this thread, a Tiktaalik analysis in another thread, etc.
If you really believe creationism isn't science, then arguing for it on the basis of science makes no sense.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by 1071, posted 04-25-2008 3:59 PM 1071 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by molbiogirl, posted 04-25-2008 6:26 PM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024