|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Status Report: The Invulnerable Refutation of Darwinism | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
I'd rather masturbate than be a dumbfuck. I don't believe you. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subbie Member (Idle past 1285 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: |
quote: We? I think they need to step up the voltage on your shock treatments, mate. And I think so, too. Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.1 |
CFO writes: mark24 writes: I'd rather masturbate than be a dumbfuck. I don't believe you. Ray Bloody hell, really? If you honestly can't work out why someone would prefer masturbating to being dumb, you need to masturbate more often. I mean it, go have one now. It might just calm you down a bit. In fact, I can't help but speculate that this might just be the reason why you're always so angry. Seriously though Ray, what exactly are you trying to achieve by posting this thread? We already know that you're working on your magnum opus. You've said already. We know, the folks at TalkOrigins know, the folks at AnswersinGenesis know, the folks at Fundies Say the Darndest Things know (well, the ones who don't think you're a parody at least)... We already know you're writing a world conquering paper. This is not new information. Tell us when you're finished. You must have known that people would use this thread as an opportunity to rip the piss out of you. I am left wondering if that is the point; you proffer your backside, specifically so that it can be kicked and you can collect some more stigmata from your holy battle with the Evilutionist Conspiracy. I can't help feeling that your time could be better spent. Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2136 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
The scientific method is first and foremost observation. You are silently alluding to testability and the false assumption that Creationism-Design to fail in this crucial respect. Of course evolution is not testable in the way that you claim it to be. This is supported by the fact that evolution is an interpretation of evidence. This means evolutionists are running a rigged lottery since the interpretation is not subject falsification----not ever, but it is misrepresented to be just that. The only aspect of evolution that is truly on the table, eligible for falsification, revision, or modification, is causation and tempo. But the explanation or interpretation of evidence in favor of perpetual transmutation producing common ancestry is off the table and not subject to falsification or revision. You are so far wrong its not even worth discussing. Is your entire "treatise" going to be done on this level? Shouldn't you even have some knowledge of how science works if you are purporting to make an argument that affects science? (And see tagline...) Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluescat48 Member (Idle past 4220 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: |
"What is something that a double agent would say?" Alex: "correct....please select again." off topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granny Magda Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.1 |
There is a topic?!
Mutate and Survive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Isn't it to guess when Ray starts frothing?
He's got to be near now, a few more prods....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
I agree with what was said in message 63:
Seriously though Ray, what exactly are you trying to achieve by posting this thread? We already know that you're working on your magnum opus. You've said already. We know, the folks at TalkOrigins know, the folks at AnswersinGenesis know, the folks at Fundies Say the Darndest Things know (well, the ones who don't think you're a parody at least)... We already know you're writing a world conquering paper. This is not new information. Tell us when you're finished. You must have known that people would use this thread as an opportunity to rip the piss out of you. I am left wondering if that is the point; you proffer your backside, specifically so that it can be kicked and you can collect some more stigmata from your holy battle with the Evilutionist Conspiracy. When Ray's topic first showed up, I was thinking that he might as well of titled it "Please Kick Me". Seemed to be totally pointless other than to provoke others to heap abuse. It, however, is now time to cool things off. Ray's been kicked enough. Maybe time to instead pelt him with marshmallows. Or something like that. Please, no replies to this message. Adminnemooseus New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts. Report a problem etc. type topics:
Report Technical Problems Here: No. 1 Report Discussion Problems Here: No. 1 Thread Reopen Requests Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], [thread=-17,-45], [thread=-19,-337], [thread=-14,-1073] Admin writes:
It really helps moderators figure out if a topic is disintegrating because of general misbehavior versus someone in particular if the originally non-misbehaving members kept it that way. When everyone is prickly and argumentative and off-topic and personal then it's just too difficult to tell. We have neither infinite time to untie the Gordian knot, nor the wisdom of Solomon. There used to be a comedian who presented his ideas for a better world, and one of them was to arm everyone on the highway with little rubber dart guns. Every time you see a driver doing something stupid, you fire a little dart at his car. When a state trooper sees someone driving down the highway with a bunch of darts all over his car he pulls him over for being an idiot. Please make it easy to tell you apart from the idiots. Source |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4989 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
evolution, since Darwin, says mankind evolved from an ancient ape ancestor that lived millions of years ago. Ancestor of apes or an ancestor that was an ape? When you claim this in your thesis Ray, what is the reference that you supply to support it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dokukaeru Member (Idle past 4645 days) Posts: 129 From: ohio Joined: |
Hi Ray, nice to meet you. I am somewhat new to this forum, so I do not know your history here.
Could you please elaborate a little on the scientific evidence you have discovered that falsifies evolution? It has been almost 150 years and still not one single piece of evidence that falsifies evolution. With that being said, you can see why I( and everyone else here) am very eager to see this evidence of the falsification of evolution. Thanks in advance,Joe
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5225 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
Dokukaero,
Could you please elaborate a little on the scientific evidence you have discovered that falsifies evolution? None, he fails on the title of his paper. If knowledge is invulnerable is isn't science. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
Ancestor of apes or an ancestor that was an ape? When you claim this in your thesis Ray, what is the reference that you supply to support it? Charles Darwin: "We thus learn that man is descended from a hairy quadruped, furnished with a tail and pointed ears, probably arboreal in its habits, and an inhabitant of the Old World. This creature, if its whole structure had been examined by a naturalist, would have been classed amongst the Quadrumana, as surely as would the common and still more ancient progenitor of the Old and New World monkeys" (Descent Of Man 1871:389, Vol.2). Are you claiming that you did not know that evolutionary theory claims mankind to descend from the lower animals, apes, "hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears? Are you claiming not to know that idiots with shovels have been digging in Africa for decades convinced that man evolved from an ape-like creature that lived millions of years ago? Since the implication is unavoidable (gutter racism) I can understand why you might be feigning ignorance about the main claim of evolution concerning the origin of mankind. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears Um, cats are hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears. Maybe Darwin was saying humans evolved from cats. Speaking personally, I find few things more awesome than contemplating this vast and majestic process of evolution, the ebb and flow of successive biotas through geological time. Creationists and others who cannot for ideological or religious reasons accept the fact of evolution miss out a great deal, and are left with a claustrophobic little universe in which nothing happens and nothing changes. -- M. Alan Kazlev
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4989 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
Are you claiming that you did not know that evolutionary theory claims mankind to descend from the lower animals, apes, "hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears? I am claiming that evolutionary theory doesn't claim that mankind descended from apes, I always thought that mankind and apes shared a common ancestor, an 'ape-like' creature, which is what you are now claiming too.
Are you claiming not to know that idiots with shovels have been digging in Africa for decades convinced that man evolved from an ape-like creature that lived millions of years ago? Is an 'ape like' creature an 'ape'?
Since the implication is unavoidable (gutter racism) That's rich coming from a follower of a faith that is proud of its attempted genocides.
I can understand why you might be feigning ignorance about the main claim of evolution concerning the origin of mankind. I wasn't feigning anything, it is just that your claim for evolutionary theory is different from what science says about evolution. So, does science say we evolved from apes or an 'ape like' creature?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3078 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
off topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This comment acknowledges defeat in our exchanges and attempts to signal a Moderator to provide some satisfaction on the intellect who beat him up. Ray
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024