If Jack the ripper had no reason to kill his victims, he wouldn't have killed them. This means that it is possible to get no physical cause and effect, without a motivational cause.
I'm sorry, but what the hell is "reason" and "motivation"? (assuming for the latter that the noun naturally follows from your adjective - difficult to tell as I have no idea what it is)
The attempt to drag me into the semantics
you're wallowing in semantics - no one needs to drag you there...
If NO X then no cause Y and effect Z.
This is logically correct because physical causes and effects can't NECESSARILY happen without a motivation.
What?
Instead of stating that I am incorrect, first understand what I am saying.
Try for coherence rather than word-salad, and we might have a chance...
It is clear that I am correct.
Yep, clearly
Please give up the layman philosophy - it really hurts the eyes...
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.