Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quantum physics: Copenhagen vs decoherence interpretations
ramoss
Member (Idle past 641 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 53 of 57 (482468)
09-16-2008 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Syamsu
09-16-2008 4:45 PM


Re: Freewill
Re: Freewill
Well spoken, like an ideal atheist. You pressure science on people with such force, while at the same time you say it is depressingly nihilistic. I also wonder how for instance people will be ready to be a judge or juror, when they havent learned to differentiate free behaviour from forced behaviour.
Strange that you would object to weirdness of toothbrushes deciding in a thread about quantummechanics. Evidently you know very little about the weird findings of qm in regards to interrference, and whichway information.
And you are right that I loathe science, and scientists generally also. But even I can understand that fundamentally there is a generally free will paradigm, and a generally causal paradigm, since the scientists talk about these 2 fundamental paradigms commonly. You dismissed the free will paradigm, so nice going for getting nowhere at all in discussing quantum mechanics.
You mean, he actually wants this thing known as 'evidence' and 'facts'??? I personally like evidence and facts on which to base my conclusions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Syamsu, posted 09-16-2008 4:45 PM Syamsu has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024