onifre writes:
To what cosmos theory specifically?
1. Relative to everything from the present BBT to what drives the expansion. I've made comments in the past regarding the possibility of the portion of what is observable that it may be a minuscule area of the total universe.
2. As I understood the link, the observed expansion may perhaps be due to gravitational pull from bodies significantly greater than what we are able to observe.
3. What interested me also was the point that due to the velocity of light, we may not have any empirical method of determining the age of the universe which perhaps might lend some support to my eternal universe position.
onifre writes:
Perhaps, this is the first true evidence for multi verses that we are seeing. Pretty cool.
I didn't get that notion from it at all. I understood it as suggesting the possibility of a universe far greater in volume than we can imagine.
Imo, the notion of multi-universes is a misnomer in that even if there are scattered huge areas of matter/mass in the universe they would all come under the meaning of
universe. Again, that's just my opinion. Perhaps that would lend support to a flat space POV.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.
™ Version 4.2