From
Message 268:
Catholic Scientist writes:
Kelly writes:
I recommended the very source needed to see the difference. "What is Creation Science?" Morris/Parker
I'm familiar with the book....
All it does is attack evolution. It offers no positive evidence of creation, it does not lay out a theory, it does not provide supporting evidence, it does not make predictions. If anything, it show just how unscientific creation science is.
Kelly replies with, in
Message 277:
Kelly writes:
You are parroting a common claim that has no truth to. If you were really familiar with the book, you would know this and you would know what creation science really is too.
How much do you want to bet that Kelly has never even read the book?