Hi JCgirl92,
Could I just remind you that:
Bare links with no supporting discussion should be avoided.
Perhaps you would like to take a few minutes to summarise the link that you provided?
Posting a link with no supporting discussion means that readers will not know exactly what point(s) you think are important.
Also, by posting a bare link you open up the possiblity of someone answering your claims with a bare link of their own, and we end up with very little discusssion at all.
So, if you could, would you summarise what you would like to discuss from this link, and give an explanation to us non-scientific types of what exactly you are getting at?
Thanks.
AdminBrian.
{An added note from Adminnemooseus - I personally don't see any great problem with this "Bare link with no supporting discussion". It seems to be more of a "throw out some general information" type of a message. Still, a little verbal summary would be nice for us unable to download and/or unable to take the time types.
Perhaps this topic would have been better placed in the "Links and Information", "Miscellaneous Topics", or "Is It Science?" forum, but I'm not qoing to worry about it right now. If and when the topic develops further, maybe a move will be made.}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 08-30-2003]