Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Alternative Cosmology?
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 1 of 25 (559657)
05-10-2010 11:17 PM


Recently I have been taking a small break from Evolution to go back to a topic of strong interest in my past: Cosmology. This is really nothing new but I just wanted to get a discussion going:
Open Letter on Cosmology
What has the scientific community that specializes in cosmology have to say about this or had said? I also recall some conferences that were organized about the issue. One of their arguments are based on how the BBT requires the addition of things like dark matter that have not been observed or w/e and is just speculative. See the article for yourself and tell me what you think.
More info: A Cosmology Group
Do you think the recent results for the XENON100 will stimulate a new pool of ideas on our current cosmological model (BBT) or perhaps seek to formulate a new model/competing model all together?
XEON link: Search for Dark Matter Still Empty-Handed, Scientists Say | Space
I am not arguing against the BBT but out of my lack of understanding in comparison with many people here on the forums, I would like to get familiar with these other concepts.
Edited by CosmicAtheist, : No reason given.
Edited by CosmicAtheist, : No reason given.
Edited by CosmicAtheist, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by tesla, posted 05-11-2010 10:53 AM CosmicAtheist has not replied
 Message 4 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 5:16 PM CosmicAtheist has replied
 Message 6 by Taq, posted 05-11-2010 5:58 PM CosmicAtheist has replied
 Message 23 by Bikerman, posted 07-30-2010 10:13 PM CosmicAtheist has not replied

  
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 5 of 25 (559800)
05-11-2010 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by slevesque
05-11-2010 5:16 PM


I wonder what this would mean though? How much changing in our understanding in Cosmology/Astronomy will be required? Will we then have to find new methods of measuring distant objects or throw some theories away? What would this entail?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 5:16 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 6:16 PM CosmicAtheist has replied

  
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 7 of 25 (559805)
05-11-2010 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Taq
05-11-2010 5:58 PM


Perhaps, which is why I am not completely against the BBT, but I have read some websites with stimulating new ideas as you mentioned. But don't you think after 30 years of failing to detect dark matter that there should be more funding towards alternative explanations like plasma cosmology? I am not saying they should ditch dark matter but open up new possibilities.
Plasma cosmology - Wikipedia Wiki on Plasma Cosmology, interesting stuff.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Taq, posted 05-11-2010 5:58 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Taq, posted 05-11-2010 8:01 PM CosmicAtheist has not replied

  
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 9 of 25 (559814)
05-11-2010 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by slevesque
05-11-2010 6:16 PM


Interestingly enough I was reading on how Einsteins theory could be wrong and need a bigger revamp in New Physics than we thought:
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=was-einstein-wrong-about-relativity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 6:16 PM slevesque has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 6:46 PM CosmicAtheist has replied
 Message 11 by cavediver, posted 05-11-2010 6:50 PM CosmicAtheist has replied

  
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 12 of 25 (559823)
05-11-2010 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by slevesque
05-11-2010 6:46 PM


No you have to pay for that, sorry I was foolish enough to post such. So I will give you another link:
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/44738
Once again I am just asking questions, come from an ignorant perspective and like learning what other people say hence why I post here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 6:46 PM slevesque has not replied

  
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 13 of 25 (559824)
05-11-2010 7:00 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by cavediver
05-11-2010 6:50 PM


Could you link me to some threads for me to read?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by cavediver, posted 05-11-2010 6:50 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by cavediver, posted 05-11-2010 7:11 PM CosmicAtheist has replied

  
CosmicAtheist
Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 31
From: Washington, USA
Joined: 04-07-2010


Message 16 of 25 (559830)
05-11-2010 7:18 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by cavediver
05-11-2010 7:11 PM


Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by cavediver, posted 05-11-2010 7:11 PM cavediver has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024