But I'll correct a few errors first.
Yeah, that's the spirit
There are actually 3 planets, and 9 moons in our solar system that have retrograde orbits
Utterly wrong for reasons explained by others
And you are right, if the 'singularity' was spinning
Within Big Bang cosmology, there is no concept of the initial singularity "spinning". This would break rotational symmetry of the Universe.
this would explain the prevelance of rotation in the universe, but would not explain retrograde orbit.
Rotation in the Universe is a result of local dynamics. Conservation of Angular Momentum (simply a statement that the original rotational symmetry of the Universe is preserved) implies that the sum of ALL rotation in the Universe will sum to zero. Retrograde orbits and retrograde spins are simply the result of local dynamics.
Heres what you missed. The law of conservation of angular momentum states that as the distance from end to center decreases, rotation of the object must increase.
No, this is an implication of Cons of Ang Mom, not what it states.
If the Big Bang is true, then our solar system was formed from light gasses.
No, the Solar System was formed from a mix of light and heavy elements, although the light elements of hydrogen and helium certainly dominate. This is trivially true whether or not the Big Bang cosmology is correct. The heavier elements were formed in earlier generation stars and prior supernovae.
Radiation energy caused these gasses to collapse on themselves, forming planets, and of course, our sun.
Radiation possibly catalysed the gravitational collapse of our local gas cloud. This is far from certain and certainly not necessary - the collapse could have been instigated by a number of possible causes.
As these gasses collapsed, they would increase in rotation, based on the Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum. The sun is the largest celestial body in our solar system, having over 97% of all mass.
Ah, finally, a statement without gross errors - see, it can be done.
If the Big Bang is correct, and The Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum is correct, then we should observe the sun having 97% of the total rotational energy in our solar system.
False for many reasons. The Big Bang has nothing whatsoever to do with the angular momentum distribution of the Solar System. And given that the spin-up occured while the Solar System formed an extended proto-disc, angular momentum would have been distributed throughout the disc by varying mechanisms. I think lyx2no was instructing you on some of these. You should listen to him.
In fact, it had less than 2 % of total rotational energy. This violates a physically observed law of science, and therefore, does not explain the beginning of our solar system.
As we have seen, this is immaterial. May I ask who is feeding you with this bullshit?
On a side note, the sun would have passed through the T-tauri phase
Yes, quite possibly
and blown all the gas off the gas gaints if it were truely billions of years old.
No, it wouldn't, as the gas giants themselves were just larger blobs within the proto-disc at this time. And the proto-disc would itself shield the proto-planets from the outflow. And what has billions of years to do with this? How long do you think the T-Tauri phase lasts?
Wow, what a lot of wrong...