If you simply mean that the genetics for one's physical appearance would be more similar to those of the same "race" than to those of a difference "race," the answer would seemingly be yes. However, beyond that, I'm not aware of anything particularly significant that is found among all persons of a particular "race" that is not found in others of a different "race."
You'll notice I put the word "race" in quotes. Race, for all intents and purposes, is a sociological construct, not a biological one. It makes as much sense from a biological standpoint to talk about the Italian "race" or the Scandinavian "race" or the European "race." As far as I know, there's more genetic diversity between members of the same "race" than there is between members of of different "races." The significant defining characteristics of a race are all related to superficial appearance, with skin color being the primary factor.
BTW, not all Africans share distinct physical similarities, nor do all Asians. It might do you good to think a bit more carefully about things before you post them.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus. -- Thomas Jefferson
For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and non-believers. -- Barack Obama
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a
naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for
magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist