Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should the term species be used?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 5 of 24 (598069)
12-27-2010 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by wolfwing
12-27-2010 2:03 PM


We classify into species, in order to better organize biological data. It doesn't matter that the division points are somewhat arbitrary. What's important, is that they are useful.
Should we give up our concept of length, because the division points on the ruler are arbitrary?

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by wolfwing, posted 12-27-2010 2:03 PM wolfwing has seen this message but not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 21 of 24 (598284)
12-29-2010 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by wolfwing
12-28-2010 11:27 PM


wolfwing writes:
Einsteins theories replaced newtonian physics because they worked better in describing what was seen.
And modern cladistics replaced Linnean taxonomy.
wolfwing writes:
Thats sorta what I feel here with the current definition or idea of species, that it's adequate in short time or snapshots, but doesn't erally work for long time in my mind.
If you can come up with a better idea, one that works better, you should try publishing it in a research journal.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by wolfwing, posted 12-28-2010 11:27 PM wolfwing has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024