Author
|
Topic: Please..who know about GARIAEV researchs?
|
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
|
Message 31 of 40 (612232)
04-14-2011 9:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 30 by PauLita 04-14-2011 9:22 AM
|
|
The real answer.
Oh good grief. Frikken infomercials. What's next, prayer hankies?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 30 by PauLita, posted 04-14-2011 9:22 AM | | PauLita has not replied |
|
PauLita
Junior Member (Idle past 4723 days) Posts: 4 From: Vilnius Joined: 04-14-2011
|
|
Message 32 of 40 (612233)
04-14-2011 9:34 AM
|
Reply to: Message 30 by PauLita 04-14-2011 9:22 AM
|
|
Re: Answer
P.P.Gariaev writes: A quartz cuvette with a DNA sample is moved from one location to another. And a trace, a phantom, is left in the air in the original location of the sample. This phenomenon was registered using the laser spectroscopy method by P. Gariaev in 1984 in Russia and by the group of R. Pecora in 1990 in the U.S.A. Now let us look at the original work of R. Pecora (1990):
Stuart A.Allison, Susan S.Sorlie and R.Pecora. Brownian Dynamics Simulation of Wormlike Chains: Dynamic Light Scattering from a 2311 Base Pair DNA Fragment. Macromolecules 1990, 23, 1110-1118 writes: Also, shot noise present in experiments would be expected to increase the amplitude of the second and higher peaks. One possible explanation is the presence of trace amounts dust in light scattering experiments. When a small (comparable to the noise level) amplitude component of a gradual exponential decay is added to simulated g(t) data, mimicking the effect of dust, the CONTIN distribution function can be significantly altered. And compare with the "translation" of P. Gariaev:
Gariaev writes: As a matter of fact similar effect had been observed by Allison et.al. who also used DLLD method to study restrictive fragments of DNA. The research group also observed anomalous light-dispersion/scattering of such objects. The authors defined the phenomena as ‘mimicking the effect of dust’. In their experiments the effect was not due to any form of dust contamination but was a consequence of behavior of the object which acted as a dust particle scattering light. To sum up the finding, such a conduct of the particles produces characteristics of light-dispersion which do not comply with the classical models of light-dispersion for linear polymers. There can be found a common ground between these two kind of experiments (Allison et.al. and Gariaev et.al.) related to the fact that DNA samples were irradiated by light in the visible spectrum - 632.8 nm and 488 nm. In the formation process of DNA wave replicas, a dominant function is assumed by, perhaps, the emitter whose wavelength coincides/matches with the DNA’s absorption wavelength.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 30 by PauLita, posted 04-14-2011 9:22 AM | | PauLita has not replied |
|
Wounded King
Member Posts: 4149 From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Joined: 04-09-2003
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Message 33 of 40 (612234)
04-14-2011 9:36 AM
|
Reply to: Message 30 by PauLita 04-14-2011 9:22 AM
|
|
At least the scam question is being cleared up.
I know I should resist the spammy troll but seriously! What sort of abstract ends with a direction to bow to the genius of the first author and multiple exclamation marks. I wonder if my co-authors would go for it on our next submission. TTFN, WK
This message is a reply to: | | Message 30 by PauLita, posted 04-14-2011 9:22 AM | | PauLita has not replied |
|
PauLita
Junior Member (Idle past 4723 days) Posts: 4 From: Vilnius Joined: 04-14-2011
|
Re: spam
Peter Gariaev writes: you are mudak No more mudak, than this one:
Replies to this message: | | Message 35 by subbie, posted 04-14-2011 10:06 AM | | PauLita has not replied |
|
subbie
Member (Idle past 1285 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: 02-26-2006
|
|
Message 35 of 40 (612236)
04-14-2011 10:06 AM
|
Reply to: Message 34 by PauLita 04-14-2011 9:40 AM
|
|
Re: spam
Oh good. Just what this thread needs, another sock puppet. Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate ...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
This message is a reply to: | | Message 34 by PauLita, posted 04-14-2011 9:40 AM | | PauLita has not replied |
|
limarodessa
Junior Member (Idle past 4761 days) Posts: 1 Joined: 04-14-2011
|
Re: Gariaev Peter
Peter Gariaev writes: ... See my site in respect our publications ...
Hello Petrovich ! I am very glad to see you. How are you? Edited by limarodessa, : No reason given.
Replies to this message: | | Message 37 by jar, posted 04-14-2011 1:08 PM | | limarodessa has not replied |
|
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: 04-20-2004
|
Re: Gariaev Peter
And yet another (maybe or maybe not) spammer shows up.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 36 by limarodessa, posted 04-14-2011 12:58 PM | | limarodessa has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 38 by NoNukes, posted 04-14-2011 9:16 PM | | jar has seen this message but not replied |
|
NoNukes
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 38 of 40 (612356)
04-14-2011 9:16 PM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by jar 04-14-2011 1:08 PM
|
|
Re: Gariaev Peter
jar writes: And yet another (maybe or maybe not) spammer shows up. One thing I find interesting is that most of these apparent "sock puppets" have have accounts that are months old, even though they have made few if any posts before today. The OP apparently posted similar junk a couple of years ago. Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 37 by jar, posted 04-14-2011 1:08 PM | | jar has seen this message but not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 39 by Jon, posted 04-14-2011 11:26 PM | | NoNukes has seen this message but not replied |
|
Jon
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 39 of 40 (612361)
04-14-2011 11:26 PM
|
Reply to: Message 38 by NoNukes 04-14-2011 9:16 PM
|
|
Re: Gariaev Peter
One thing I find interesting is that most of these apparent "sock puppets" have have accounts that are months old, even though they have made few if any posts before today. From what I can tell, the accounts all seem to open up on the same day as the first (often only) post. Love your enemies!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 38 by NoNukes, posted 04-14-2011 9:16 PM | | NoNukes has seen this message but not replied |
|
PauLita
Junior Member (Idle past 4723 days) Posts: 4 From: Vilnius Joined: 04-14-2011
|
|
Message 40 of 40 (612388)
04-15-2011 2:37 AM
|
|
|
Peter Gariaev (Physicist) self-awarded Gold medal in 2010 ( Telesio Galilei Home page )
|