Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,922 Year: 4,179/9,624 Month: 1,050/974 Week: 9/368 Day: 9/11 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   People, please read this... (re: Same sex mariage)
zephyr
Member (Idle past 4581 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 46 of 234 (50588)
08-14-2003 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Zealot
08-14-2003 11:49 AM


Re: This Damn Serious Problem
quote:
Hi, I believe the posters problem with Marriage is that Marriage is originally a religiously instituted function. In his/her case he/she would oppose not civil weddings, but religious weddings. This degrades everything the church believes in.
Personally if 2 gay men want to call themselves married, feel free, I couldn't care less, however to do so with the notion that a Christian God approves of it is mockery of the Christian Faith.
Let's view legal and religious marriage as two separate things, then. If they weren't considered the same thing by so many people, legal recognition of gay marriage wouldn't be such a big deal. Of course, the fact that only certain people, largely ordained ministers, are allowed to perform legal marriages, makes that step forward rather difficult to achieve.
quote:
You might as well be disgusted at how Christians show hatred towards child molesters or people committing beastiality.
Actually, in my experience, and in that of many other people, Christian churches are a great source of shelter and character witnesses for child molesters and spouse abusers, especially male ones. I have lived with two of them (my father and stepfather), and in both cases people just wouldn't accept that a man of God could be guilty of such things until it was painfully obvious. The gender inequity inherent in the Jewish law and Paul's writings does a lot to perpetuate this. My mother regularly attends and organizes support groups for victims of spouse abuse, formerly married to men who were not only respected members of the church but leaders and even pastors. If you want to talk about deviance, don't go dragging the gays into the discussion. Their so-called crime hurts nobody, and the breeding-obsessed mentality that has made "normal" people fear them is a detriment to today's overpopulated world. I'm sick of hearing gays equated to predators and rapists. There's nothing to justify the comparison, only ignorance and fear.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Zealot, posted 08-14-2003 11:49 AM Zealot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by doctrbill, posted 08-14-2003 1:51 PM zephyr has not replied
 Message 49 by Zealot, posted 09-09-2003 12:39 PM zephyr has replied

zephyr
Member (Idle past 4581 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 57 of 234 (54786)
09-10-2003 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Zealot
09-09-2003 12:39 PM


Re: This Damn Serious Problem
quote:
Considering that marriage (correct me if I'm mistaken) originated as a religious ceremony, it would indeed be difficult to seperate the two. The fact that the government introduced financial benefits to being 'married', was discriminating to non-religious people, thus non-religious marriages were introduced. Next step, gay people feel discriminated against and so now they also want to be married.
This is all pretty much factual and I agree with it.
quote:
Personally, I couldn't care less if 2 same sex people wanted to consider themselves married, however to try to do such is a religious context is futile.
"In" a religious context, it is already done. All the time. It may be futile to try in your church, but there are many others.
quote:
Little bit bias statement.
No, no bias. Factual statement. I have seen it several times and stated the facts, generalized for those several situations.
quote:
Churches generally could be seen as way to rid oneself of 'guilt' of sin. My cousin forinstance had a very bad relationship with her husband, neither in any way religious, but when things got bad, including him trying to commit suicide, they turned to the Church for moral support and became 'Christians'.
It's great that they found that support. But I'm talking about people who have been in the church or churches all their lives, who are upstanding members of the community and seen as authority figures and mentors, who use this to hide their misdeeds. I never said it was everyone. Please try to view my statement in the context of the post to which I was replying.
quote:
I can well imagine that many child molesters are not happy about their circumstance and want to find a way to solve the problem. Not difficult to go to church and become a 'Christian' really.
Especially if you're already a pastor.
quote:
PS, your statement is actually pretty hatefull. Your experience is one thing, but no Christian church EVER condones paedofiles or adulterers.
There goes the h-word again... please understand that I am not accusing churches of condoning such behavior. I am saying that the us-vs-them mentality of many churches leads people to trust so-called men of God to an irrational degree, to such a degree that they ignore credible accusations of abuse and such. I have seen this with my own eyes.
quote:
'Love and honour your wife' ... yeah sounds alot like those Christian women beating men.
Don't go telling me it doesn't happen just because it's not supposed to happen.
quote:
Funny, but this entire post is about typecasting ONE apparent 'Christians' hatred onto an entire Christian community. Nothing is mentioned about any prior threads in that discussion, just that one post saying 'Look at how Christians HATE people', how can they be like that.
What? What are you talking about? I personally know of the behavior of many people, not just one, and I never claimed that it represented all. I'm only saying that it is a well-established pattern observed by me and by people to whom I am very close. I don't claim that Christianity is responsible for the abuse. I claim that it is an undeniable fact that Christianity fails to prevent abuse within its own ranks. That's all I see.
quote:
I am truely sorry for your discomfort.
Don't worry, I'm well on my way to getting over it. Life goes on, y'know....
quote:
I am good friends with 2 women that have been abused in their youth, and pray that such a thing would never happen to any of my children. Having said that if your best friend does such a thing, and is being accused and you honestly believe him to be innocent, I am sure you would also stand as a character witness.
Of course I would.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Zealot, posted 09-09-2003 12:39 PM Zealot has not replied

zephyr
Member (Idle past 4581 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 152 of 234 (62194)
10-22-2003 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by Zealot
10-22-2003 11:42 AM


TwinCrier contradicts himself on the current applicability of the Mosaic Law and tries to bury it amid a sheer mass of verbiage.
Oh, and he (she?) needs to learn how to spell "throne." That's just embarassing....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Zealot, posted 10-22-2003 11:42 AM Zealot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Zealot, posted 10-22-2003 5:52 PM zephyr has replied

zephyr
Member (Idle past 4581 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 154 of 234 (62200)
10-22-2003 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Zealot
10-22-2003 5:52 PM


Be reasonable. I pointed out the glaring contradiction regarding the law because I'm not as informed on the other issues. It's still telling that so many people who violate Levitican law daily (if not every waking minute) are rabid proponents of the disputed Levitican proscription against same-sex behavior. I too see cause for doubt in the translation, and it is childish of you to proclaim victory on the subject simply because I felt it was not my place to speak thereof.
You haven't even refuted my argument, let alone those of the other participants, and theirs are the ones that count.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Zealot, posted 10-22-2003 5:52 PM Zealot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by Zealot, posted 10-22-2003 8:35 PM zephyr has replied

zephyr
Member (Idle past 4581 days)
Posts: 821
From: FOB Taji, Iraq
Joined: 04-22-2003


Message 158 of 234 (62233)
10-22-2003 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by Zealot
10-22-2003 8:35 PM


quote:
What exactly is your argument ? You stated that someone contradicted themselves and pointed out a spelling mistake.
I noted that the person to whom you referred us made points are not self-consistent. His overall argument is the same as yours. So, if you want to use it, it would be a good idea to answer the repeated question as to whether the entirety of the OT law applies. Then we'll know whether you're a)supporting your view with a law that is invalid or b)committing yourself to follow every letter of the law as long as you feel the need to object to other people having fun behind closed doors.
To be honest, I think it would be a bad idea for me to get any more involved in this thread. I'm about to take off for a couple of weeks and I'd hate to just bail in the middle of a good discussion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Zealot, posted 10-22-2003 8:35 PM Zealot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 162 by Zealot, posted 10-23-2003 8:00 AM zephyr has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024