jimiwa writes:
Hi, I heard about a researcher of the 1970's. He came to the conclusion through his research, and he was the leading researcher in his time in his field, I think it had to do with genetics and evolution, that it is possible that Darwin's theory of evolution is false. This is an interesting case because it could be used as an example to break the ice for people who don't believe in evolution because he was not motivated by religious beliefs, he came to this belief solely by his research, which to an agnostic/atheistic scientist would be a more effective way at convincing them. Then, after such people realize that there's someone not motivated by religious beliefs that came to question evolution, they may have more room in their mind to come to a level of faith or be more open to the possiblity of creation.
Does anyone know who this researcher was? I really want to know.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Jimewa. Welcome to EvC.
What really matters, after all is what is said and done pro and con for or against evolution, not whether the person is a creationist or secularist.
It doesn't even matter if the person is a scientist. That's what is
supposedly what EvC (evolution vs creation) means. Creationism, usually implies a creator ('ID). Anything applying to the supernatural is not considered science here at EvC, however.
I guess, question impies [i]Evolution vs ? since creationism implies a creator. Creation implies the supernatural. No?
™ Version 4.2