As I said they are identical AS TO THE PROCESSES OF THEIR DEPOSITION.
And this is obviously untrue. Hence the cross-bedding in one and not in the other.
Those have nothing to do with the mechanism of deposition.
A number of them have a bearing on the mode of deposition. For example, marine limestone is invariably deposited underwater, whereas sediments with the footprints of land animals in them are invariably not deposited underwater.
YES, IDENTICAL IN THAT THEIR MANNER OF DEPOSITION WAS THE SAME ...
No, obviously not.
Nor are they identical in the sense that they are identical, this being the usual meaning of the word "identical".
And their general appearance shows that, their horizontality, their relatively flat uneroded surfaces, etc, which show that they were both deposited by a huge quantity of water. This general appearance of ALL the otherwise different strata is obvious to the naked eye.
This "general appearance" is something that you made up in your head and have continued to lie about even after being exposed to the facts. And what makes this behavior even more ridiculous and disgraceful is that you are reciting this witless lie to people, such as myself, who are perfectly aware that you were mistaken and that you are lying.
Your photographs were undecipherable as I recall ...
You recall wrong. But if what you mean is that
you, personally, were too blind, too stupid, or too dishonest to see what I waved right in front of your nose, then that is not a criticism of the evidence, but a confession of your blindness, stupidity, or dishonesty.