Hello DrkBeloved
DrkBeloved writes:
So try this one on folks .... I dare anyone to prove that creation is wrong. Try it. Use all the science you want. I love to study, I love science, and I also love God. But you know what, I have yet to hear or read of any proof for evolution which refutes creation.
When I first read this I was surprised that you would even ask such a thing. I mean, come on DrkBeloved...simpy peruse this webpage and you'll see creationism disproven over and over again. That is, it has been disproven over and over again if you abide by the scientific method. And you do claim to love science. But now I see what your game plan may be. Before we can address this issue we will need to read your version of creationism. You see, DrkBeloved, it seems that we can't get a consistant creation "theory". If you happen to be a "global flood" creationist then this will be easy, cuz it's already been done hundreds of times. Go to the Geology and Great Flood threads and do some reading. If you're a "God started it with the big bang and evolution took off from there" creationist, then (as Crashfrog as already stated) it will be impossible to "prove" your creationism idea wrong.
So,DrkBeloved, the ball is back in your court. Please, give us your idea of how you think creationism operates.
Later you said this:
DrkBeloved writes:
When so many scientific factors had to come together against such unreasonable odds to form life, is it really that difficult to postulate some higher power was at work?
Please explain what you mean by "unreasonable odds"? I hope you're not gonna claim that nonsense about how the probablility of even a protein "evolving" is so small that it could not have happened (without your higher power). Is that what you think?
Looking forward to reading your response.
™ Version 4.2