quote:
The history of a new discovery goes like this: First critics say, "you are crazy!", (forgot second step; something like, "Your evidence for that is inadequate."), then finally, "We knew that all along."
The history of a failed discovery is at first people claim "you are crazy", then finally "we told you you were wrong all along."
Do not delude yourself into thinking that just because you have an unpopular theory you must have the right one.
quote:
Philosophy of science is the discipline...
Which I have spent the most time of my life researching professionally and for fun. So now I have to listen to you tell me what you learned 30+ years ago and swallow it hook line and sinker? Sorry Steve.
I am unsure where you were taught, but even 35 years ago they were teaching basics of research methods which we use today in science classes. If your professors of science were saying something else, then you did not get your money's worth.
If you did not change your mind after getting out of class then perhaps you are not reading the right material.
However, one must question this claim on your part since you are decrying modern scientific methods. This must mean that you have seen your original PoS professors were downright wrong if they were teaching anything other than MN. For all this research you are decrying is at least as old as that.
quote:
I personally tested that conclusion, and found it correct.
You cannot test a method against itself. You must test it over time against other methods. Given the MN has replaced the tenets of your H-D methodology centuries ago, one has to question why you found yours "correct".
quote:
I still find the "people are naturally inclined to delude themselves, unlike other living species." idea more complex than the, "mad behavior in living beings is normally caused by malignant parasites." idea.
This is contrary to reason. Your explanations are circular, even if you bring in dark matter or energy. I mean is this dark matter calculated to be in people? No. Does it have any contact with people? No. Does it have some theoretical connection to the behavior or thoughts by people (other than the physicists who postulate it based on calculations and expectations)? No.
Other than suddenly asserting here is something we do not understand and therefore it must explain what I need explaining wayyyyyyyyyy ovvvvverrrrr heeeeeeeere, it makes no sense at all.
quote:
Cargo cults cannot have improved fitness, and turning a mirage into an oasis also would be unlikely to improve fitness. So, that some religious activities do improve fitness is not explained that way. It is simpler, I think, to suppose that the cargo cult people were demonized, and deceived. Only my opinion, of course.
You have not shown that any other religions do provide fitness, much less what the proper mechanism is for that fitness. I should also note that the cargo cults did stay alive so how do you know they didn't live better than they used to after creating their religion?
You are ignoring the obvious and in order to come to your opinion. And what's more you are avoiding the question... what does Occam's razor say about this?
We can see that people made a religion regarding (ascribed extra characteristics to) something they did not understand. We know children do this same sort of thing all of the time until they are taught how to ask questions and understand the world around them.
We know that Xian scientists claim that prayer gets them along just as well as medicine... but it does not.
The simplest mechanism for this behavior is the anthropological one. Creating a class of entities with all sorts of diverse characteristics and powers (particularly when they have to take on ad hoc characteristics) is not in keeping with Occam's razor.
You can state it is your opinion that you are right about demons all you want. You can even claim that the unpopularity of your position makes you believe that you are probably right. But you CANNOT claim that Occam's razor will support you in this endeavor. To do so involves completely circular reasoning.
If we can agree on this, then we are getting somewhere.
holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)
™ Version 4.2
