Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution as Fact and Theory
q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 22 (82418)
02-03-2004 12:41 AM


That was a powerful opening argument. The author THINKS that evolution is a fact.
Intelligent design is a fact. Irreducible complexity is a fact. All you need is one thing to tip over the whole applecart of evolution. Like the Paluxy river prints. "Poof". End of evolution.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Macavity, posted 02-03-2004 1:13 AM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 11 by Silent H, posted 02-03-2004 1:16 AM q3psycho has not replied

  
q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 22 (82450)
02-03-2004 2:01 AM


Hi guys. One thing at a time. first the paluxy prints:
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/taylor-trail.htm
So this is direct evidence and we should look at it for ourselves and make a decision.
As far as irriducible complexity, if you cut my liver out I'm going to have a heck of a time living. So that means we were created with a liver.
Now, intelligent design means that if it wasn't evolved then it was designed. So you are right though that we still need to see if it was by the Christian God or by one of the false prophets.
That's probably another topic to do. This one is on evolution.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 02-03-2004 2:06 AM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 15 by crashfrog, posted 02-03-2004 3:56 AM q3psycho has not replied

  
q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 22 (82458)
02-03-2004 2:13 AM


OK thank you nosy ned. I'll look at the ID thread.
I read the page saying the paluxy tracks were controversial. But the page I showed has the photographs. Your page doesn't have any photographs. Look at 3B. it sure looks like a man print inside of a dinosaur print.

  
q3psycho
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 22 (82495)
02-03-2004 5:01 AM


You guys, I'd be happy to look at PHOTOS of the tracks you say are frauds. the problem is that I posted a photo above that looks like a human print inside a dinosaur print. You haven't even looked at it.
But I went to all the sites you posted and read what they had to say.
Looks to me like this is a one way street.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by crashfrog, posted 02-03-2004 5:19 AM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 18 by Silent H, posted 02-03-2004 7:02 PM q3psycho has not replied
 Message 19 by Silent H, posted 02-03-2004 7:13 PM q3psycho has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024