Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Evolution as Fact and Theory

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution as Fact and Theory
Macavity
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 10 of 22 (82429)
02-03-2004 1:13 AM 		Reply to: Message 9 by q3psycho
02-03-2004 12:41 AM

Advice
Hello, q3psycho!
​
Welcome to EvC. In another thread I noticed that you referenced Answers In Genesis as a source to refute evolution. I am curious, have you put in much time browsing through AiG? Here is their position on the Paluxy river prints:
​
Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artefacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs. However there is much evidence that dinosaurs and humans co-existedsee Q&A: Dinosaurs.
​
Arguments to Avoid Topic | Answers in Genesis
​
This may come as a surprise to you, but this Paluxy claim has been refuted many, many, oh-so-very-many times on this forum. Try using the forum search function---or, better yet, take a look at what Talk.Origins has to say about the Paluxy tracks.
​
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
​
Enjoy!
​
--Macavity
​
​
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by q3psycho, posted 02-03-2004 12:41 AM q3psycho has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024