Hello, q3psycho!
Welcome to EvC. In another thread I noticed that you referenced Answers In Genesis as a source to refute evolution. I am curious, have
you put in much time browsing through AiG? Here is their position on the Paluxy river prints:
Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artefacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs. However there is much evidence that dinosaurs and humans co-existedsee Q&A: Dinosaurs.
Arguments to Avoid Topic
| Answers in Genesis
This may come as a surprise to you, but this Paluxy claim has been refuted many, many, oh-so-very-many times on this forum. Try using the forum search function---or, better yet, take a look at what Talk.Origins has to say about the Paluxy tracks.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html
Enjoy!
--Macavity
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.