One thing at a time. first the paluxy prints:
Just so you know,
both the Institute for Creation Research and the Answers in Genesis folks have determined that the Paluxy prints are not evidence of creationism, because they're not human footprints.
Most of them are actually obscured dinosaur tracks that, with proper cleaning, are readily identifiable as such. Some of them are simply depressions with no sign of an instep or arch, that only appear human with selective highlighting.
Some of them have been visibly altered in a fraudulent attempt to make them look human. As a result the tracks have been repudiated by all but the most gullible/dishonest/misinformed creationists. You'd be wise to do the same, I think.
Thanks to
CC101: Paluxy River footprints
[This message has been edited by crashfrog, 02-03-2004]
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.