|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Electro-mechanical engines of Perpetual Motion and Natural Selection | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
You simply could not stay away could you? Like the male polecat sniffing for his old scent markings. You do not breed on this patch anymore. Thats called Evolution.
Monkeys do not type. You confuse them with mathematical statisticians. How strange that I never get e-mails intended for you. I find you evasive, shallow and ignorant and utterly incapable of indepedent and original thinking.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
Don't worry about maths. Just make sure that everthing you do has a spin velocity component. That gets you there.
[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 02-11-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Cresswell Inactive Member |
quote:Well, I think if you answer the questions that have been posed for you first then you may consider calling others evasive. And, in English please. Simply, clearly, without all your strange allusions to irrelevancies. Preferably backed up by maths that is recognisable as maths. Oh, and while you're at it using conventional meanings for words like "energy" and "power". quote:Hmm, who around here knows no more physics than a couple of buzz-words and names of physicists? Who hasn't bothered to engage in discussions elsewhere on this forum? (OK, I admit it's been a few months since I posted here) quote:Well, the examiners of my PhD thesis thought I did OK in that regard. And the referees of several research papers. In science original work is done by building on the work of others, "standing on the shoulders of giants" as some have said, not throwing out what is currently known on a whim. Or do you mean "independant and original" to be the kind of thoughts produced by indulgance in hallucinogenic substances? I'm wondering just which Alan Cresswell these comments refer too ... anyone else wish to comment who they fit best?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Cresswell Inactive Member |
Remember, if you play around with numbers and symbols enough you can "prove" anything. All very clever, but unless you are rigourous in applying formal logic and mathematical convention there is no way any such "maths" will ever be taken seriously.
Get your maths right and your argument is irrefutable. Start by assuming 1=2 (or some equal mathematical stupidity) and it'll be treated as nothing more than a joke.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22502 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.9 |
Hi, All!
Alan Cresswell writes: How strange that I never get e-mails intended for you. I find you evasive, shallow and ignorant and utterly incapable of indepedent and original thinking. I hope everyone feels comfortable that the Forum Guidelines are being applied somewhat more leniently in this thread. I don't want to spoil the fun. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
Stop appealing for comments from anyone else. Stand on your own two feet and do not look for comfort through a herd instinct.
Applying the Conservation of Energy to a Bernoullui liquid spin vortex gives 2H=H. Elementary centrifugal force/spin chamber area. Maybe you feel the need for a peer review to discuss this. You clearly cannot handle it and pretend never to have read my stuff. You have though and could only prove me right but lack the ability to handle it properly. The luvvies you call peers weighed your papers. They did not read beyond page one. Why is the world not reeling from your findings? Why do you look for comfort in a crowd?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Abshalom Inactive Member |
Permissive Percy says, "I hope everyone feels comfortable that the Forum Guidelines are being applied somewhat more leniently in this thread. I don't want to spoil the fun."
Thanks, Percy, it is rather humorous even though I have no earthly idea which Cresswell is which, which is legit, or even if they both are one entity or maybe some sort of two-psyche, bicranial, Siamese-schizo twins. Anyhow, will someone someday clue me in to the maths of it all? Peace in Percyville.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
wj Inactive Member |
The English love their eccentrics.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Cresswell Inactive Member |
Well, fluid mechanics isn't my strong point but a quick Google is very informative. Within Bernoulli's theorem, the quantity H (incidentally, dimensions of energy per unit mass ... it's not clear at all on your page what you're using H for as nothing is clearly laid out with relevant dimensions) is assumed constant. So then using that to try to determine changes in H does seem a bit odd, to say the least.
quote:Well, judging by the fact that I've yet to receive a referees report that hasn't commented on things throughout the paper, I assume they did read the whole thing. On the otherhand, if anything you've submitted for publication is like your webpage I doubt anyone could manage to supress their hysterics to get beyond the first paragraph. quote:Probably because I'm no more than a small cog in the big wheel that is good science. I've collected and reported a lot of data, maybe someday someone else will be able to use some of that data in formulating an earth shattering theory. I doubt it, but you never know. I do know that as you show no evidence of either learning from, or contibuting to, the work of others you will always be just some nutter out there having no impact on the world of science apart from as some toy for people to play with. "Hey, want a good laugh? Look at this lunatic ... wants to tell us we're wrong and can't even tell the difference between force and energy"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Cresswell Inactive Member |
I'm me, he's him ... I think
Yes, we are different people who just happen to have the same name. I'm legit, he's a loon. And, don't worry about the maths ... it's total nonsense. A bit like trying to understand a sentance in English but written according to the rules of Chinese grammar. Except it's worse than that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Abshalom Inactive Member |
Well, thanks. That totally clears it up for me, Doc.
Hmmmmm. I am you are we and he is all together ... coo coo cah choo ... [This message has been edited by Abshalom, 02-11-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
Let peace and love reign today. Even for you my beloved. My Google window is full of hearts and cherubs and I am full of remorse for kicking your arse when I should have turned the other cheek and sent you flowers.
I am 66 on Sunday but if you send me a love card and a bottle of very, very cheap champagne, I shall change my name by deed poll and resign my position as the worlds leading intellectual. Greater love have no man. Unless its you of course. I miss you. My box is empty. I miss you ALL.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Eta_Carinae Member (Idle past 4403 days) Posts: 547 From: US Joined: |
nut.
A pure and simple, 100%, case of dementia. Question: Is your website meant as comic relief OR (what is more frightening and likely) do you really believe this nonsense?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Melchior Inactive Member |
I would like some sort of step by step explanation of the
quote: to
quote: process.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Cresswell Inactive Member |
Good luck. I asked the same question, in almost identical form, back in September and still haven't got a reply.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024