|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 65/40 Hour: 1/5 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Syamsu  Suspended Member (Idle past 5618 days) Posts: 1914 From: amsterdam Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Forum: Darwnist Ideology | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Syamsu  Suspended Member (Idle past 5618 days) Posts: 1914 From: amsterdam Joined: |
Because social-darwinism is the reason you are here discussing creation vs evolution. Without it the controversy wouldn't have the societal significance it does, and in all probability you wouldn't be here discussing creation vs evolution.
regards,Mohammad Nor Syamsu
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
quote: Whichever is better supported by the available evidence, of course.
quote: Don't be so hasty there. Every time you add 2 + 2, the prejudicial language of mathematical ideology prevents you from getting 5. My goodness, what a morally bankrupt field of study. I don't care if it does equal 4, I want it to be 5. As long as it equals 4, the prejudicial nature of mathematical ideology should be obvious. I want a whole forum devoted to claiming that 2 + 2 = 5. "It isn't faith that makes good science, it's curiosity." -Professor Barnhard, The Day the Earth Stood Still
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6503 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
The creation versus evolution debate pre-dates eugenics..but in any case, this stupid thread is not getting us any closer to a forum discussing the much more relevant unrevealed breast of Janet Jackson. Why are you avoiding this topic? Could it be the judgemental terms such as right breast and left breast? It leads to such anti-social behavior as Mr. Hambre claiming Kid Rock can sing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
Why would you want to discuss Janet Jackson's breasts when Eliza Dushku's magnificent, perfect breasts are right there?
Wait, wait, that's reproductive competition... OH CRAP, I'M GETTING PREJUDICIAL! SOMEBODY HELP ME!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.3 |
Why would you want to discuss Janet Jackson's breasts when Eliza Dushku's magnificent, perfect breasts are right there? Surely the 'right here' in that sentence should have been a link?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dan Carroll Inactive Member |
Hey... this is still a family thread, mister.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6503 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
Now you have gone and done it. You had to introduce judgmental and prejudicial language like "right here" as opposed to "over there". Rather than competitive breasts, links should have been provided for both...You see brother Syamsu..I have learned, I have learned.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrHambre Member (Idle past 1421 days) Posts: 1495 From: Framingham, MA, USA Joined: |
It may interest you clowns to know I used to share a zipcode with Eliza "Tru Cancellation" Dushku. Namely the borough of Watertown, MA, where her mom still lives on Garfield Street. I can give directions to potential stalkers. You could smell the seething sex all the way down Mount Auburn, etc. etc.
When I said that Kid Rock is a 'lower organism,' I didn't think I was going to take such a ration of shit from you biologists. I'm not impressed with the DNA profile showing that he does seem to have the normal human amount of chromosomes. He is inferior, and I have videotape to prove it. I stand by my claim, and Conrad Nagel was a Nazi. regards,Esteban "Nipple Clamp" Hambre
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
Let Syamsu expound on his viewpoint, even if you don't agree.
If you don't feel it worth responding to, don't respond to it. Adminnemooseus Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to Change in Moderation? or too fast closure of threads |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4087 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
No creationist agrees with Bryant? Who said that? Not me.
The creation vs evolution controversy is carried on wide public support, it's not just Christian fundamentalists. In general public opinion the concern about the immorality associated with evolution theory is also widely held. This is so patently untrue that I can't believe you would even suggest it. Generally, the public outside of Christian fundamentalists are concerned about the immorality associated with evolution theory? Surely, this was meant as a joke to elicit a laugh. Fundy's are concerned about their literal Bible, and Americans in general have a morality different from fundy's (and different from me, as I'm not very happy with America's morals, either), but don't blame evolution for that. The Romans managed to hold some pretty objectionable (to me) morals just fine without it.
I think this wider concern is what creationists are mainly supported by Okay, creationists are concerned about morals, and they insist that evolution is responsible for general American morals, which they (and I) object to. I'll buy that, but I doubt that's news to anyone. However, you are saying that it is morality that fuels the creation evolution debate. No one agrees with you, including me, and you've provided nothing to support your position except that some guy about 80 years ago agreed with you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MrHambre Member (Idle past 1421 days) Posts: 1495 From: Framingham, MA, USA Joined: |
I hope it's obvious that no one else has any interest in engaging you-know-who in another protracted and futile tournament of Because-I-Said-So. He believes we are all basically Holocaust deniers and that Darwinism is indistinguishable from Nazism. No amount of dialogue has been able to persuade him that he's even the least bit mistaken in these delusions.
If he wants to continue believing the rubbish he spouts, and ignoring every rational argument to the contrary, then let him. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by responding to his repetitive ravings, and there is no evidence that he can contribute constructively to any discussion of science, politics, or history. The dark nursery of evolution is very dark indeed. Brad McFall
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mammuthus Member (Idle past 6503 days) Posts: 3085 From: Munich, Germany Joined: |
I would further add to Mr. Hambre's warning that Syamsu, by his own inadvertent admission, has not actually read much of the literature which he criticizes (The Selfish Gene comes to mind). He has also been directed by me several times to Daniel Kevles book "in the name of eugenics" which goes far more in depth (than a few pathetic websites) regarding the origins of eugenics concepts and far into the 20th century where some governments, notably the U.S. and Sweden were still practicing eugenics as part of government programs. While your desire to debate is commendable, you will be stuck as Mr. Hambre warns in a "you are wrong because I said so" pissing match with a complete ignoramus.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Silent H Member (Idle past 5847 days) Posts: 7405 From: satellite of love Joined: |
Shortly after I first came to EvC I ended up getting into a debate with Syamsu. I was politely warned not to bother as it would end up going nowhere.
I went round and round for some amount of time (I should note it was not on this topic). Eventually I learned my lesson... the advice had been wellfounded. Syamsu every once in a while has some credible commentary, but there are a few subjects that he holds so dear to his heart there simply is no communication. Social-Darwinism happens to be one of these subjects. You can always try and tear down his wall, but don't knock yourself out trying to do so. Thus I third MrH's recommendation. [This message has been edited by holmes, 02-12-2004] holmes "...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5223 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
I managed to get you-know-who to agree to a statement regarding differential reproductive success, he then proceeded to continue to rubbish drs whilst still agreeing with the original statement !?. So I fourth MrH's recommendation.
Mark
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4087 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
To all of you:
Thanks. Sheesh, I of course realized it already. Is there some sort of pill one can take that helps one restrain from answering posts that are clearly not worth answering? Whoever came up with it would be rich, because looking around these boards I see I am not the only one who has this terrible problem.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024