And what will you debate in this forum, Syamsu, and with whom? May as well have an auto-responder to every post which says something like:
"There is no 'darwinian ideology'. Science is not a basis for morality. We wouldn't give a stuff if evolution did cause immorality, it'd still be true."
Ok, Syamsu, let's suppose for a second that darwinist ideology exists and has had a negative effect on society. Now, tell me, what bearing does this have on the truth of the theory? And, secondly, assuming evolutionary theory is true; should we lying to people about it due to its negative effects?
So supposedly this is a serious reply, but of course it's drivel.
I thought I'd try and give you the benefit of the doubt, and this is your response? How about you try again, and see if you can manage to respond in a more constructive manner?
Didn't you already admit to having not read The Selfish Gene? If this is so, why on earth should we take anything you have to say about Dawkins as anything more meaningful than a cat walking across a keyboard?
The largest known determining factor in behaviour is hereditary. This has been shown time, and time again in a multitude of studies, covering all aspects of apptitude and behaviour.
Roughly 50% of behaviour is determined by heredity. 10% is determined by nuture. We don't know what accounts for the other 40%.
These are facts determined by extensive scientific research.
Posting the same message more than once is spamming, Catapam, and very rude. Please also try to only post messages which are relevant to the actual topic - your post has no place here. Either post to a thread it does have a relevance to, or as I suspect would be better for this post, propose a new topic.