Milagros,
Let's use some real observations here. The following is from
Observed Instances of Speciation
In 1964 five or six individuals of the polychaete worm, Nereis acuminata, were collected in Long Beach Harbor, California. These were allowed to grow into a population of thousands of individuals. Four pairs from this population were transferred to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. For over 20 years these worms were used as test organisms in environmental toxicology. From 1986 to 1991 the Long Beach area was searched for populations of the worm. Two populations, P1 and P2, were found. Weinberg, et al. (1992) performed tests on these two populations and the Woods Hole population (WH) for both postmating and premating isolation. To test for postmating isolation, they looked at whether broods from crosses were successfully reared. The results below give the percentage of successful rearings for each group of crosses.
WH WH - 75%
P1 P1 - 95%
P2 P2 - 80%
P1 P2 - 77%
WH P1 - 0%
WH P2 - 0%
They also found statistically significant premating isolation between the WH population and the field populations. Finally, the Woods Hole population showed slightly different karyotypes from the field populations.
These two populations of a once interbreeding population were separated for about 30 years. When brought back together, the two populations were not able to produce offspring. The last sentence from the above quote: "Finally, the Woods Hole population showed slightly different karyotypes from the field populations." The karyotype of a genome is the morphological characteristics of the chromosomes. The Woods Hole group shows different chromosome characteristics, and therefore a change in DNA structure. The reason why both populations did not have this change in chromosome morphology is because they were kept separate. Now, did keeping them separate CAUSE the change in the chromosomes? No, this is due to mutation. Did keeping the populations separate cause this change in chromosomes only to happen in one population? YES. Speciation is caused by changes in the DNA AND breeding isolation. If you only have one of these ingredients, speciation will not occur.
The changes in the DNA is macroevolution, since such a drastic change is the cause for speciation in isolated populations. However, it was small, incremental steps (microevolution) that led to the overall differences. Therefore, macroevolution is just the accumulation of microevolutionary events.
Does this clear things up? (not meant to be sarcastic, BTW. We really want you to understand where we are coming from).