EvC Forum: Re: Skeptics being wrong about the Bible. The Bible skeptics errancy list

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: Re: Skeptics being wrong about the Bible. The Bible skeptics errancy list

AdminAsgara

Administrator (Idle past 2331 days)

Posts: 2073

From: The Universe

Joined: 10-11-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 26 of 58 (89685)
03-01-2004 10:35 PM

Reply to: Message 24 by kendemyer
03-01-2004 10:10 PM

Editing

Ken, you continue to do this. Do not keep editing posts and removing data without documentation. If you wanted others to disregard your original point 3, than just make a new post explaining this. Conversely, you could edit your post to explain why you want point 3 disregarded without removing the data.

In my opinion, other than spelling errors or code errors, nothing should be removed from a post on the chance that others have already read it. If you want to be careful, please utilize the preview button or better yet, compose your post in a word processing program where you can make sure it is how you want it before posting.

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
	Message 24 by kendemyer, posted 03-01-2004 10:10 PM		kendemyer has not replied

AdminAsgara

Administrator (Idle past 2331 days)

Posts: 2073

From: The Universe

Joined: 10-11-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 33 of 58 (90066)
03-03-2004 2:40 PM

Reply to: Message 32 by kendemyer
03-03-2004 1:31 PM

Ken

Ken,

Due to your stated refusal to substantiate your claims, and your almost passive/aggressive dismissal of numerous requests to utilize forum features such as the reply to post arrow, I am now officially asking you to restrict your posting to the Free for All forum. This does not include starting NEW topics at this time.

Any complaints concerning this can be discussed in one of your already existing threads in the Suggestions forum.

Failure to abide by this decision can be grounds for suspension.

added by edit - Thought I would add the "last straw" quote before it got changed in edit.

I would also say that Brian fails to see my perspective in regards to providing more specificity regarding which particular skeptic made a charge against the Bible that was later overturned. I would ask what incentive is there for me to do so? Considering that I researched the Jonah piece and provided multiple pieces of corroborative evidence and completely refuted your fallacious argumentation and the string was closed before I could do more of the same, I see zero incentive. I would say the moderators in this Bible section of EVC Forum have demonstrated their commitment to intellectual freedom and no words they can offer as an afterthought will cause me to go out of my way to offer more specificity in this string. Until there are changes in this section of EVC Forum I guess Brian and others will have to at suspect that the Oxford Bible Commentary may be justified in taking a "chastened historical criticism" approach in their commentary

[This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 03-03-2004]

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
	Message 32 by kendemyer, posted 03-03-2004 1:31 PM		kendemyer has not replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 34 by wj, posted 03-03-2004 6:12 PM		AdminAsgara has replied

AdminAsgara

Administrator (Idle past 2331 days)

Posts: 2073

From: The Universe

Joined: 10-11-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 35 of 58 (90138)
03-03-2004 6:27 PM

Reply to: Message 34 by wj
03-03-2004 6:12 PM

Re: Ken

WJ,
I do understand the wish to see something of value come from this thread. Ken already has four topics in the FFA, three topics in the Suggestions forum, one topic in the Links forum and three topics in the Bible: Acc and Iner. This does not count the two threads closed by AM and myself.

I could move this thread to the FFA, giving Ken 5 outlets for his posting. Personally I feel the sheer number of threads he has started has already given him an excuse for his poor debating and posting style. Let me stew on this, and get input from the other mods about moving this thread. Shoot me a reminder by the end of the week and I'll make a decision.

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
	Message 34 by wj, posted 03-03-2004 6:12 PM		wj has not replied

AdminAsgara

Administrator (Idle past 2331 days)

Posts: 2073

From: The Universe

Joined: 10-11-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 40 of 58 (92988)
03-17-2004 5:36 PM

Reply to: Message 38 by kendemyer
03-17-2004 5:10 PM

Re: TO: ALL and Mr. Bound

Hi Ken,
I have a question into Admin concerning just where you are allowed to post. There is some question as to whether or not Admin lifted my restriction of you to the FFA when he lifted your suspension. I would greatly appreciate if you would hold on posting out of your FFA threads until this has been made clear.

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
	Message 38 by kendemyer, posted 03-17-2004 5:10 PM		kendemyer has not replied

AdminAsgara

Administrator (Idle past 2331 days)

Posts: 2073

From: The Universe

Joined: 10-11-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 53 of 58 (94263)
03-23-2004 8:52 PM

Reply to: Message 52 by kendemyer
03-23-2004 8:39 PM

Re: to: brian

Ken, is there a reason that you are posting out of your threads in the FFA?

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe

This message is a reply to:
	Message 52 by kendemyer, posted 03-23-2004 8:39 PM		kendemyer has not replied

AdminAsgara

Administrator (Idle past 2331 days)

Posts: 2073

From: The Universe

Joined: 10-11-2003

Normal Thread Display

Message 55 of 58 (95197)
03-27-2004 7:41 PM

Reply to: Message 54 by kendemyer
03-27-2004 7:30 PM

Re: another example of an errant skeptic

Ken darlin', are you going to make this a habit? If you can not abide by the rules and moderator suggestions, then my only option will be to suspend you once again.

AdminAsgara
Queen of the Universe