Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is Gravity, how does it come about.
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 14 of 79 (95872)
03-30-2004 6:39 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 4:42 AM


Space did not and cannot be curved, the energy that brought you the message [light] was bent by gravity.
There is no gravity, much like there is no spoon. There is only straight-line motion through curved space.
How could shooting a particle at an atom move it towards you?
Particle conceptions of gravity are deeply flawed. Only bent spacetime removes the contradictions of gravity. (See, I can get dogmatic, too.)
Incidentally, you make simple catagoric errors like that
Errors? Or observations? Your position contradicts observation, therefore it is rejected.
[This message has been edited by crashfrog, 03-30-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 4:42 AM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:02 AM crashfrog has replied
 Message 24 by Lizard Breath, posted 03-30-2004 11:54 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 16 of 79 (95877)
03-30-2004 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 7:02 AM


My position is confirmed observation and also attributes it to real objects and forces.
There's no such thing as "force", only particle exchange.
Gravity makes no sense as a particle exchange, but only as curvature of spacetime. Since we observe the effects of gravity, and since gravity can only be curved spacetime and not a particle exchange, and since there's nothing else gravity could be, we know that spacetime exists, because we perceive effects of its curvature.
Your position is, again, refuted by observation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:02 AM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:28 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 18 of 79 (95883)
03-30-2004 7:50 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 7:28 AM


Aren't you a little early for All Fools Day?
My, aren't we clever. How long did it take you to Google for that little rejoinder? I'm cut to the quick, I must say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:28 AM V-Bird has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 29 of 79 (96003)
03-30-2004 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Lizard Breath
03-30-2004 11:54 AM


If space occupies everything and everywhere - l x w x h , how can it be straight or curved?
It's my understanding that it curves into additional dimensions that we can't percieve. Or at least, that's how it's explained.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Lizard Breath, posted 03-30-2004 11:54 AM Lizard Breath has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 2:34 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 73 by Lizard Breath, posted 03-31-2004 5:50 AM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 32 of 79 (96019)
03-30-2004 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 2:34 PM


Explained by whom exactly?
By dem folks what do explainin'!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 2:34 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 3:11 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 44 of 79 (96093)
03-30-2004 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 6:44 PM


First we must separate it from 'G-force' or powered acceleration, that of say a motor car or fair-ground ride.
You're in a soundproof rocket with no windows. You're either sitting at rest on the Earth's surface or you're accelerating in space at one g. How do you tell the difference?
Moreover, if Einstien couldn't, how do you expect to?
There is no difference between gravity and acceleration, because gravity is acceleration caused by deformed space.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 6:44 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:40 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 46 of 79 (96104)
03-30-2004 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 7:40 PM


You didn't answer my question. Take your time.
a rocket uses its propulsion against the resistance of the atmosphere and gravity to accelerate to E.V.
Rockets push against the atmosphere? What kind of horseshit is that?
[This message has been edited by crashfrog, 03-30-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:40 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:55 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 48 of 79 (96110)
03-30-2004 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 7:55 PM


Are you familiar with the term Co-efficient of drag?
Are you familiar with Newton's laws of motion? Because you don't seem to be.
they would notice only subtle differences to do with environment
What differences? The rocket is soundless and has no windows. There's nothing that can enter the rocket except for gravity.
1G, strangely is not the same as the amount of gravitation they would feel on earth, similar but not the same.
It's exactly the same.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 7:55 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:07 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 51 of 79 (96118)
03-30-2004 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:07 PM


No, it is not Gravity, it is inertia that holds them in place.
You still haven't explained how you tell the difference. And your insistance on two separate forces that have exactly the same effect is becoming pretty comical.
No, 1G is less than the gravitation experienced on Earth.
The gravity experienced on the Earth's surface (at some specific reference altitude, I'm sure) is exactly one G, because that's how a G is defined.
You're trying to tell me that one isn't equal to one? By all means, keep talking. Maybe some sense will come out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:07 PM V-Bird has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 53 of 79 (96123)
03-30-2004 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:11 PM


Let's see if your simple maths are as good as you make out.
Let's see if yours is, via multiple choice:
9.8 m per second per second is equal to:
1) 10 m per second per second
2) 8 m per second per second
3) 9.8 m per second per second
There's no difference between the units used for gravity and the units used for acceleration - it's meters per second per second in each case.
If you answered anything but 3, send back your diploma - you didn't earn it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:11 PM V-Bird has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 55 of 79 (96130)
03-30-2004 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:25 PM


You never seem willing to answer questions, Why is that?
I'm happy to answer any relevant questions you care to ask, to the best of my limited knowledge. So far, few of your questions have been relevant.
What is deformed space?
The presence of mass distorts space. Straight-line motion through warped space appears curved to observers in the universe. Duh.
Is 1bar = to 1 atm.
Obviously not. But one atm = .987 bar. That's the same quantity expressed in different units.
Ok, here's my three:
Does 1 g = 1 g?
How would you tell the difference between acelleration of one g and gravity of one g acting on a space capsule with otherwise no connection to the outside world?
Why the fuck are you bringing up pressure in a discussion of gravity and acceleration?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:25 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:40 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 60 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:44 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 58 of 79 (96135)
03-30-2004 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:35 PM


The next thing is, are you aware of Einsteins micro-gravity effects on accelerating bodies [as in your example] and there absence with a resting body on the Earth...
Cite, please? Note that "your ass" is not a convincing citation.
How would you detect these effects inside the space capsule? Assume that it's large enough to contain any equipment you like so long as none of the equipment penetrates the capsule.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:35 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:47 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 59 of 79 (96136)
03-30-2004 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:40 PM


Did you see my answer to why there is a difference between inertial G and gravitation?
You mean your bullshit? I thought you were kidding. You're serious?
Please, try again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:40 PM V-Bird has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 62 of 79 (96140)
03-30-2004 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:40 PM


You must have mis-read google... 1 bar is LESS than 1 Atmosphere... 14.3PSI against 14.7PSI
You're right, I did. The table wasn't exactly clear.
Revised figures: 1 atm = 1.0132500 bar = 14.6960000 psi.
Same pressure measured in different ways. So obviously different numbers.
But acceleration and gravity are the same thing measured in the same units. So 1 g = 1 g. It's lunacy to conclude differently.
9.8 m/s^2 is 9.8 m/s^2 no matter what you measure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:40 PM V-Bird has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:54 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 63 of 79 (96143)
03-30-2004 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by V-Bird
03-30-2004 8:47 PM


You don't seem to know your Einstein stuff do you... type 'Einsteins painter' into google, there has to be something there that will enlighten you.
How about you just tell me, Dr. Mysterious? Or don't you even know?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by V-Bird, posted 03-30-2004 8:47 PM V-Bird has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024