In another thread, ICANT wrote
I know what evolution is.
I also know what is being preached as evolution.
Probably the number one biggest complaint most of us have about creos is that they in fact don't know what the ToE says, and usually end up arguing against a misunderstanding, rather than the real thing. I assume everyone would agree with me that it's counterproductive to argue against evolution based on what it doesn't say.
I would like give you creos an opportunity to prove that you in fact do know both "what evolution is" and "what is being preached as evolution."
Tell us.
I'm not asking you to provide any evidence for or against any theory. I'm not asking you to argue for or against it. In fact, I'd rather you not argue against it in this thread. I just want you to describe what you think the ToE says. Moreover, if you think you understand evolution (macro, micro or otherwise) but think that it contradicts with what the ToE says, please describe that conflict.
I would much prefer that you cite a source for your understanding. I'd also much prefer that you cite a scientific source for your understanding. If you can only find creationist sites that support your understanding of what the ToE is, you might seriously want to consider that your understanding is flawed.
In any event, please tell me what you think the ToE is.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat