|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: mind reading | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
So, Petrophysics, in the thread, "Are Thoughts Trancendent?", made the claim that he can read minds, or as he puts it "perceive people's thoughts", and even provided an example.
here An excerpt:
quote: I pointed out some major flaws with his example here, but Petro never addressed them.
An obvious problem with your test is that you are intimately aware of just about everything that has happened to your own child. It isn't a surprise that you would be able to be so specific, since the high points in a 9 year old's life are likely to be connected to his family, and his father is likely to know about them. Another obvious flaw in your test was that you didn't write down your "reading" before asking him to tell you what he was thinking about. He could have changed his thought to conform to what you said yours was because he wanted his dad to be a real mind reader, or to please you. Have you ever tested your ability on total strangers, where careful protocols are followed, like not speaking with the person at all beforehand and you both writing down your "results" before revealing them? Others in that thread asked him why he doesn't use his remarkable ability to prevent crime, or to win the Randi Foundation prize and then donate the money to charity. Any responses, from anyone?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
I predict that Petrophysics will be unable to detect this thread.
“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels ------------- Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
heeheeheeheeheeheeheehee!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3322 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Well, when I really try I can read people's minds too. It's called picking up clues here and there and remembering details of my target person.
For example, when I was in college, I noticed something funny about my resident assistant's attitude toward women. He never actually said anything, but I guess I picked up enough clue to know this christian dude was a sexist. I mentioned it once to him and he spent the next hour trying to convince me he wasn't a sexist. Next day I had lunch with him and he began to tell me his case about how god created women to be "lesser" than men. This guy had biblical support too. He was one of those that carried a bible with him all the time. But the point was I didn't actually read his mind. I just noticed from the way he talked of the special roles he thought god had planned for men and for women. I'm just wondering if this is what's going on with Petrophysics but I guess on a more detailed scale. Perhaps this guy can subconsciously make cold readings of someone else and somehow convinced himself that he's actually reading the person's mind? When it comes to it, I really don't know what's going on here. since petrophysics isn't that forthcoming about the details of his mindreading ability, I don't see how any of what he said is useful to us. Owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have occasionally used the academic jargon generator to produce phrases that even I don't fully understand. The jargons are not meant to offend anyone or to insult anyone's intelligence!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Well, yeah, that's pretty much what I think, too.
The whole reason I called him out on this thread is because he took a shot at liberals in another thread, specifically calling most of us "irrational". He's claiming he can read minds through picking up their brain waves, but we're the irrational ones. Riiiiight.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
C'mon, don't you want to discuss your mad skillz?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
petrophysics1 Inactive Member |
PD,
No, Midol doesn't work! It cannot stop you from becoming a bitch. This thread's existence is the proof of that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1498 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
This thread's existence is the proof of that. Funny; what it proved to me is that you're an idiot.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member Posts: 3992 From: Adirondackia Joined: Member Rating: 7.5 |
petrophysics replying to nator writes: bump for PurpleDawn, does Midol work? Read my mind. (Hint: Duh.) Real things always push back. -William James Save lives! Click here!Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC! ---------------------------------------
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
petrophysics1 Inactive Member |
Funny; what it proved to me is that you're an idiot. I am unable to show myself to be an idiot as much as you did yourself in the Philosophy Thread. So you have me beat there. Edited by petrophysics, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
petrophysics1 Inactive Member |
Are you still delusional enough to think you "won" that philosophy debate?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
petrophysics1 Inactive Member |
I understand.
You need to read everything here. You have not done that so you are lost. Most people show up here and start posting, I didn't do that. I have read everything for the last year and a half and then some. So if you missed what I was refering to, to bad.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1498 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Are you still delusional enough to think you "won" that philosophy debate? I guess I don't really think of it as "win" or "loss." I didn't expect my arguments to sway anyone around to my opinion if they were already committed to philosophy's merits. And that is what we were talking about - opinions. I did prove that philosophy does not have rigor as a field; the only disagreement was the significance of that, and I didn't expect that disagreement to be resolved. But I don't recall any time that I asserted that I "won" that debate. What are you talking about, exactly? You did assert that you're a mind reader, which is a pretty extraordinary claim, and now you're calling people names because that claim has been shown to be unsupported. Why is that such a big deal to you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPhat Inactive Member |
Far too many personal attacks and mudslinging in this thread for my satisfaction! Nator, as an admin I will let you reopen it if you really insist.
For now, I'm closing it, however.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: ROTFLMAO!!! Petro, how do you think it looks to everyone that you have resorted to calling me a bitch instead of actually addressing the OP? I haven't called you any names, yet here you are, getting all emotional and lashing out, um...irrationally. Whazza matter, hon? Going through male menopause or something? I am not a "bitch" for holding your feet to the fire regarding your claim of being a mind reader, nor for starting this thread in response to your incredibly ironic accusation that liberals are irrational. If I'm just a bitch with no foundation for my OP, then it should be very easy for you to demolish it with a rebuttal, shouldn't it?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024