Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Checking for validity of supposed early christian gay marriage rite
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 12 of 124 (480806)
09-06-2008 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Hyroglyphx
09-06-2008 1:56 PM


Re: Getting on with the 21st century
NJ writes:
But at a minimum, I think it should be a state's decision.
Exactly! And keep it the hell out of Social Security.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-06-2008 1:56 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 19 of 124 (480877)
09-07-2008 11:52 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Taz
08-31-2008 4:36 AM


When Same-Sex Marriage Was a Christian Rite
Taz, your article brings up the question of why the federal government should be in the business of marriage. Such a religious conflation of federal jurisdiction flies squarely in the face of the First Amendment:
quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting and establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press, or the right of the people too peaceably assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
As such, gay marriage might be sanctionable by a state, but not by the federal government. So why does it even matter if same-sex marriage was ever a Christian rite?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Taz, posted 08-31-2008 4:36 AM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Taz, posted 09-07-2008 1:28 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5530 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 65 of 124 (484871)
10-02-2008 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by New Cat's Eye
10-02-2008 11:37 AM


Troll?
CS asks Ludo:
Do you still think Rrhain isn't a troll?
Butting in here, I'd say he is not a troll, but instead a boring bumper sticker for gay marriage.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-02-2008 11:37 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by AdminModulous, posted 10-02-2008 2:35 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024