Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Apparently, God hates Sweden now, along with America, Canada, and "fags"
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 22 of 69 (182281)
02-01-2005 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by PecosGeorge
02-01-2005 8:38 AM


Re: Phelps does Christianity WRONG!
It is more than fair to associate Christianity with his kind. Since it is factions of Christianity who allow this type to attach itself and become spokesperson and are drawn into the maelstrom of such rhetoric that loses all semblance of the philosophy of its founder.
I think you've articulated an exceptionally important point. One that as an atheist I find more than a bit troubling, in the sense that it appears to me to render expostulations "not to tar all Christians with the same brush" either disingenuous or well, special pleading. Phatboy (and I'm not singling him out except as an illustration), basically engaged in a "no true Scotsman" fallacy by proclaiming that Phelps and his ilk aren't really Christians. And yet, the silence of the mainstream Christian sects - who I'd think would be the first to roundly condemn someone so, erm, un-Christian - is thunderous. Remaining silent is equivalent, IMO, to tacit approval of the message. It doesn't matter how many "nice guys" (as Phatboy attempted to illustrate with his three pastors) there are among Christians, if they allow such a rabid voice to be heard without comment or censure. As an example, when Herrnstein et al, or worse J. Phillipe Rushton, came out with their racist pseudoscience, they were vocally condemned by the biological community (Herrnstein for sloppy science at best, and Rushton for outright racism). Why can't the Christians do the same? And I don't mean on message boards.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by PecosGeorge, posted 02-01-2005 8:38 AM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by PecosGeorge, posted 02-01-2005 11:19 AM Quetzal has replied
 Message 27 by jar, posted 02-01-2005 12:34 PM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 30 of 69 (182388)
02-01-2005 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by PecosGeorge
02-01-2005 11:19 AM


Re: Phelps does Christianity WRONG!
As do I. I've attempted to get feedback and/or initiate similar conversations with several of my Christian friends (all from mainstream sects, btw). However, although expressing to me their dislike of this kind of rhetoric, more-or-less shrug their shoulders (how does it go, "I am not my brother's keeper"? - but wasn't the guy trying to weasel out of something at that point?). Anyway, I'd love to have a good conversation over a beer or three on the subject with someone who's knowledgeable.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by PecosGeorge, posted 02-01-2005 11:19 AM PecosGeorge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by PecosGeorge, posted 02-01-2005 8:33 PM Quetzal has not replied
 Message 47 by Phat, posted 02-03-2005 2:38 AM Quetzal has replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 32 of 69 (182390)
02-01-2005 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by jar
02-01-2005 12:34 PM


Re: Condeming!
I believe that it does. And not just on message boards but from pulpits and even in the media. But unfortunately, there is also a very large group of people who support and concur with everything he says.
This may indeed be the case. If so, however, such condemnation is muted or overwhelmed by the raucus chorus of those who agree with Phelps & co, or who for whatever reason refuse to condemn a "fellow Christian's witness". It may be simply I "don't get out enough" - I'm not really in much contact with Christianity outside of my Catholic wife and message boards such as this one. If you tell me that other Christian groups are counter-propagandizing, I have no reason to doubt your statement. It hasn't trickled down to me, is all.
IMHO the likes of Fred Phelps and Benny Hinn are actually far more typical of modern Christianity than any of us would like to believe. There are also the bigots and blasphemers like Pat Robertson (who would still like to be President), Jerry Falwell (who would still like to control the President), Oral Roberts, Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, Gene Scott and Bob Larson. There is also the organization that built TBN led by Paul Crouch. This organization is the funding platform and training ground for the next generation of shock-jock bigots and hate mongers.
Yep, them's the ones. Amazing how well funded they are by private donations, isn't it? Makes you wonder how many "True Believers" they attact at a few bucks a pop, doesn't it?
As Christians I believe we HAVE to acknowledge such people and speak out against them. Unfortunately, they produce entertainment that people watch, while my voice goes unheard. They are the WWF, the Reality TV, the Growing Up Gotti of religion, and like the WWF, immensely popular.
I certainly understand your frustration. If it makes you feel any better, I tend to take people one-at-a-time, regardless of affiliation or belief structure. One of the advantages of being atheist, I suppose - no preconceptions (or at least, no religious ones ).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by jar, posted 02-01-2005 12:34 PM jar has not replied

  
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5902 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 50 of 69 (182853)
02-03-2005 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Phat
02-03-2005 2:38 AM


Re: A Beer or three
Thanks for the chuckle, Phat. Seriously, tho', I agree with Pecos. This topic to feels like something that really can't be explored in an Internet forum. It's opinion, and speculation, and feelings, and it needs face-to-face feedback and body language to assist in conveying meaning. The beer is merely to lubricate the synapses.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Phat, posted 02-03-2005 2:38 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024