Yea, there is a bit of a nasty tendancy for both sides to attack the others a bit sharply. I think it should be avoided.
But most of us understand that an attack on what we happen to believe or how we think about things isn't necessarily a personal attack. We also aren't so thin skinned as to take anything posted here personally.
In the case of a specific belief in a supernatural deity there are those here who don't take that seriously. So what? Why should they?
Then there are those who don't take any interest in science. They can choose to do that. If they want to debate with those who do that's ok too.
However, I, for one, don't really care to debate about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin or anything about the nature of a diety that can not be determined by any methods I have ever heard of. It is, based on the huge disagreements between the self-professed believers, a waste of time. It always seems to come down to "cause I say so". (see how often Buzsaw tells us that the other Christians and other faiths are wrong for example) So we can leave everyone to believe what they want.
If, however, one of the believers thinks they have something to say about scientific facts, logic or explanatory theories then they have decided to play the game of science. It has some rules. They take on the need to support themselves with good data and logic. That's more fun.
SameDifference appears to what to discuss theology. Rei, apparently, isn't all that interested in taking what s/he has said so far very seriously. Samedifference only wants to discuss things on her/her terms and is leaving otherwise. Fine, there will be a place for them elsewhere.