Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Trying a President.
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 16 of 51 (430616)
10-26-2007 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Hyroglyphx
10-26-2007 10:35 AM


Re: Deposing presidents
No. This is the goal of almost any war, which has been happening long before even Greece was in power, minus the trial portion.
Sorry but in recent cases there has been no declared war. The US invaded Panama and captured their President, brought him back to the US, tried, convicted, sentenced and incarcerated him and is now planning on extraditing him to France to face other charges.
If that was legal, then would the US have any recourse if a sitting US President was treated similarly?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:35 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 7:01 PM jar has replied
 Message 19 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-26-2007 7:37 PM jar has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 51 (430685)
10-26-2007 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by jar
10-26-2007 10:46 AM


Re: Deposing presidents
Sorry but in recent cases there has been no declared war. The US invaded Panama and captured their President, brought him back to the US, tried, convicted, sentenced and incarcerated him and is now planning on extraditing him to France to face other charges.
Well, neither was Serbia or Somalia, but that didn't stop the US from doing it then either. I didn't hear any worldwide criticism over either of those. Apparently these things get sanctioned by the UN.
If that was legal, then would the US have any recourse if a sitting US President was treated similarly?[/qs]
I don't know and I don't care enough about it to concern myself over it. I'll let the lawyers fight it out. If and when diplomacy fails, then we'll let the military sort it out.

"Whatever weakens your reasoning, impairs the tenderness of your conscience, obscures your sense of God, or takes away your relish for spiritual things-- in short, if anything increases the power and the authority of the flesh over the spirit, that to you becomes sin, however good it may be in itself." -Suzanna Wesley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 10:46 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 7:09 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 18 of 51 (430686)
10-26-2007 7:09 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Hyroglyphx
10-26-2007 7:01 PM


Might makes Right?
If and when diplomacy fails, then we'll let the military sort it out.
So are you suggesting we should take military action should that happen?
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 7:01 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 9:01 PM jar has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 313 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 19 of 51 (430688)
10-26-2007 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by jar
10-26-2007 10:46 AM


Re: Deposing presidents
If that was legal, then would the US have any recourse if a sitting US President was treated similarly?
Well, you could all throw a big party, maybe sing the "Ding-dong the witch is dead" song from the Wizard of Oz.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 10:46 AM jar has not replied

  
AnswersInGenitals
Member (Idle past 179 days)
Posts: 673
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 20 of 51 (430694)
10-26-2007 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
10-25-2007 8:33 PM


So, you've indicted an 800 pound gorilla. Now what?
If a sitting or retired US President is charged and indicted under International Laws should the US turn that President over for trial?
A sitting president is also a US citizen and an ex-president is just a US citizen. So, I would think that the standard laws concerning extradition would apply. The question then is, would those laws be enforced, and if not, why not. It would be helpful to know what, if any, extradition treaty we have with the UN's International Court of Justice in The Hague. I understand, but don't remember the details, that there is an international treaty for some of this that the US (under Bush) refused to be a party to specifically for fear that some US military personnel (including the Commander-in-Chief) might be subject to such indictments.
Pity that West Wing is off the air. A perfect venue to explore your questions. Your questions have both a theoretical side and a practical side. On the practical side, I think it's just a question of what do you do after you indict an 800 pound gorilla.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 10-25-2007 8:33 PM jar has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 51 (430703)
10-26-2007 9:01 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by jar
10-26-2007 7:09 PM


Re: Might makes Right?
So are you suggesting we should take military action should that happen?
Really it all depends on the circumstances.

"Whatever weakens your reasoning, impairs the tenderness of your conscience, obscures your sense of God, or takes away your relish for spiritual things-- in short, if anything increases the power and the authority of the flesh over the spirit, that to you becomes sin, however good it may be in itself." -Suzanna Wesley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 7:09 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 9:03 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 22 of 51 (430705)
10-26-2007 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Hyroglyphx
10-26-2007 9:01 PM


Re: Might makes Right?
Really it all depends on the circumstances.
Well that certainly cleared things up. LOL

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 9:01 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 51 (430713)
10-26-2007 9:27 PM


1. The invation was a multi-nation invasion.
2. Iraq defied the world body deband of inspections etc.
3. Iraq funded terrorist suicide bombers.
4. The US lost two of the world's tallest buildings, part of the pentagon, 4 airliners and occupants, thousands of other lives and a crippled economy. Two terrorist oriented national governments were a fair exchange. We were, however foolish for establishing another Islamic regime of the same ideology as Iran's intolerant government. We should have treated Iraq and Afganistan as we did the Yugoslavs where we left them with a destroyed nation to fix themselves. We could/should have done as Israel does with surgical strikes and retreat.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 9:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 33 by nator, posted 10-26-2007 11:44 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 47 by Rrhain, posted 10-28-2007 7:30 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 24 of 51 (430714)
10-26-2007 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Buzsaw
10-26-2007 9:27 PM


Topic
What does any of that have to do with the Topic Buz?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Buzsaw, posted 10-26-2007 9:27 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:25 PM jar has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 51 (430722)
10-26-2007 10:25 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by jar
10-26-2007 9:33 PM


Re: Topic
What does any of that have to do with the Topic Buz?
I sensed this is where you were implicitly leading the conversation too.

"Whatever weakens your reasoning, impairs the tenderness of your conscience, obscures your sense of God, or takes away your relish for spiritual things-- in short, if anything increases the power and the authority of the flesh over the spirit, that to you becomes sin, however good it may be in itself." -Suzanna Wesley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 9:33 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 10:26 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 26 of 51 (430723)
10-26-2007 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Hyroglyphx
10-26-2007 10:25 PM


Re: Topic
Then actually try reading what is written.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:25 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:41 PM jar has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 51 (430727)
10-26-2007 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by jar
10-26-2007 10:26 PM


Re: Topic
Then actually try reading what is written.
With all of the hypotheticals out of the way, why not discuss the motive of the inquiry?
Are you saying this thread doesn't involve the words "President Bush?"
You're just randomly asking?

"Whatever weakens your reasoning, impairs the tenderness of your conscience, obscures your sense of God, or takes away your relish for spiritual things-- in short, if anything increases the power and the authority of the flesh over the spirit, that to you becomes sin, however good it may be in itself." -Suzanna Wesley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 10:26 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 10:51 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 28 of 51 (430728)
10-26-2007 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Hyroglyphx
10-26-2007 10:41 PM


Re: Topic
With all of the hypotheticals out of the way, why not discuss the motive of the inquiry?
Are you saying this thread doesn't involve the words "President Bush?"
You're just randomly asking?
Actually, no, not directly.
The question deals with how we should react when a sitting or retired US President is captured and placed on trial in another country.
It doesn't matter which President it is.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:41 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:56 PM jar has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 51 (430729)
10-26-2007 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by jar
10-26-2007 10:51 PM


Re: Topic
quote:
Are you saying this thread doesn't involve the words "President Bush?" You're just randomly asking?
Actually, no, not directly.
The question deals with how we should react when a sitting or retired US President is captured and placed on trial in another country.
It doesn't matter which President it is.
So the statement below has absolutely nothing to do with the inquiry?
Preferably in the "more lies from the worst administration (excluding Reagan) in history", but I don't think we have that category.

"Whatever weakens your reasoning, impairs the tenderness of your conscience, obscures your sense of God, or takes away your relish for spiritual things-- in short, if anything increases the power and the authority of the flesh over the spirit, that to you becomes sin, however good it may be in itself." -Suzanna Wesley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 10:51 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by jar, posted 10-26-2007 11:14 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 30 of 51 (430731)
10-26-2007 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Hyroglyphx
10-26-2007 10:56 PM


Re: Topic
Of course not. It was a comment to you before the topic was promoted. I forgot that AdminNem does not know how to promote the initial OP without all the rest.
The OP deals with the issue and it is applicable even if another President comes along that is even more criminal that Reagan, Bush or Shrub.
The question is since Reagan, Bush and Bush have all set precedents for doing what is outlined in the OP, if some other nation behaved as the US has recently and invaded another Nation, capturing the President, dragging the President back to the invading nation and indicting, trying, convicting, sentencing, incarcerating our President, do we have any legal recourse?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 10:56 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-26-2007 11:21 PM jar has replied
 Message 34 by Buzsaw, posted 10-27-2007 8:42 PM jar has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024