IDers may do science, but it's usually not related to ID. In fact, we keep asking for an example of ID science, but nothing is ever presented.
-
quote:
I hear evolutionists demand why don't they publish in peer-reviewed evolutionist journals, and when someone does, they say it should never have been published and try to ruin the editor's career that published.
The only example that remotely resembles this scenario involved a
review paper, not a research paper; the paper was
not submitted to the usual peer review process (since the paper was a review paper, not a research paper); and I seem to remember that the acceptance procedure was done contrary to the usual practice at that journal.
But maybe you are thinking of a different example. It's hard to tell, since, as usual you are making a statement without actually supplying any details.