Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Childhood Vaccinations – Necessary or Overkill? Sequal Thread
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 308 (427543)
10-11-2007 10:33 PM


I'll open this thread with a message from Percy in the Holistic thread relative to vaccines and autism with a response. I haven't read the original vaccine thread so as to know whether Percy's question was addressed in the original thread.
Percy writes:
The mention of a possible link between vaccines and autism is the other thing that I thought might be off. I thought studies had shown no link. This has been discussed in this thread, and I thought the science side was pretty certain there was nothing to it. But this doctor seemed to have a lot on the ball. Was she wrong?
http://EvC Forum: Sequel Thread To Holistic Doctors, and medicine -->EvC Forum: Sequel Thread To Holistic Doctors, and medicine
The following is an link which may shed some light on your question, Percy.
According to the article, vaccines given to newborns contain an array of chemicals including formaldehyde (used in embalming), thimerosal (nearly 50 percent mercury), aluminum phosphate (toxic and carcinogenic), antibiotics, phenols (corrosive to skin and toxic), aluminum salts (corrosive to tissue and neurotoxic), methanol (toxic), isopropyl (toxic), 2-pheoxyethanol (toxic), live viruses and various other components.
Among these components, previous studies suggest that there is a link between neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism, and mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines. Although U.S. health officials called for thimerosal to be removed from vaccines in 1999, the article details how--because of mislabeled package inserts and other issues--it is extremely difficult for parents and physicians to know whether the preservative is actually in the vaccine.
http://www.mercola.com/2003/jun/25/autism_vaccines.htm
Deborah Ray (healthytalkradio.com) and Dr Julian Whitaker, who has the largest alternative healthcare facility in the US (Whitaker Wellness Institure), both claim that a significant number of vaccines are administered to babies, vaccines which contain toxic amounts of mercury in them.
ABE: They both also agree with content within the above link that autism has mushroomed in the US. Whitaker claims that autism in children has increased from around one in 120 to about 1 in 2500 presently. I don't remember from which specific time period he calculated his figures. If I recall the above link cites a figure of 500% over whatever time period it cited.
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by molbiogirl, posted 10-11-2007 10:39 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 8 by Vacate, posted 10-12-2007 12:00 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 14 by Wounded King, posted 10-12-2007 2:30 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 15 by kuresu, posted 10-12-2007 2:59 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 308 (427551)
10-11-2007 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by molbiogirl
10-11-2007 10:39 PM


Re: Autism and Mercury
Mobiogirl, if Deborah Ray is full of beans so are the clinical studies which she cites regularly on her shows. I've listened to her quite regularly for years and know for a fact that she knows her stuff and backs it up with science on most of the topics she covers as do Dr Whitaker and other informative guests on her shows. How many hours have you taken to apprise yourself on health, listening to her science based wisdom? You can listen live to all of her programs on her healthytalkradio.com website. I suggest you tune in and listen for health's sake.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by molbiogirl, posted 10-11-2007 10:39 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Buzsaw, posted 10-11-2007 11:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 6 by molbiogirl, posted 10-11-2007 11:15 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 7 by molbiogirl, posted 10-11-2007 11:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 308 (427554)
10-11-2007 11:11 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Buzsaw
10-11-2007 10:58 PM


Re: Autism and Mercury
mobiogirl writes:
Mercury, in the form of thimerosal, is no longer in vaccines here in the US.
1. How can you be so sure? What is your response to the specifics of the link I cited?
2. If it was suppose to have been removed in 1999, what about all those children 8 and up today with autism born before the ban?
3. What else besides mercury is foreign to the natural body which could be detrimental to the health of newborns who get all those vaccines?
4. Imo, this vaccine business, like most pharms are more about $$ than health and welfare of the citizens to whom these foreign subsances are administered, substances, many of which the body's ecosystem is not able to cope with naturally.
5. Of the hundreds of flu strains my understanding is that one, two or three are produced like a roulette gambling wheel as to which strain will attack a given locality.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Buzsaw, posted 10-11-2007 10:58 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 308 (427565)
10-12-2007 12:45 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Vacate
10-12-2007 12:00 AM


Vacate writes:
On this point, study after study has shown that these serious effects occur at the same rate with or without vaccine.
1. Can you cite one or two of these studies? I'm wondering how they can study the population when nearly all of the child members of the population receive the vaccines.
2. It is my understanding that the incidence of autism began to escalate commencerate with the practice of vaccinating babies.
I suggest anyone who wants to get the LOWdown on this DEADLY IMMUNITY, read carefully, the following and to access the WHOLE link to get some valuable insite on how significant the $$$ is relative to this topic.
As the number of vaccines increased, the rate of autism among children exploded. During the 1990s, 40 million children were injected with thimerosal-based vaccines, receiving unprecedented levels of mercury during a period critical for brain development. Despite the well-documented dangers of thimerosal, it appears that no one bothered to add up the cumulative dose of mercury that children would receive from the mandated vaccines. "What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?" Peter Patriarca, director of viral products for the agency, asked in an e-mail to the CDC in 1999. "Why didn't CDC and the advisory bodies do these calculations when they rapidly expanded the childhood immunization schedule?"
But by that time, the damage was done. Infants who received all their vaccines, plus boosters, by the age of 6 months were being injected with levels of ethylmercury 187 times greater than the EPA's limit for daily exposure to methylmercury, a related neurotoxin. Although the vaccine industry insists that ethylmercury poses little danger because it breaks down rapidly and is removed by the body, several studies -- including one published in April by the National Institutes of Health -- suggest that ethylmercury is actually more toxic to developing brains and stays in the brain longer than methylmercury.
Officials responsible for childhood immunizations insist that the additional vaccines were necessary to protect infants from disease and that thimerosal is still essential in developing nations, which, they often claim, cannot afford the single-dose vials that don't require a preservative. Dr. Paul Offit, one of CDC's top vaccine advisors, told me, "I think if we really have an influenza pandemic -- and certainly we will in the next 20 years, because we always do -- there's no way on God's earth that we immunize 280 million people with single-dose vials. There has to be multidose vials."
But while public-health officials may have been well-intentioned, many of those on the CDC advisory committee who backed the additional vaccines had close ties to the industry. Dr. Sam Katz, the committee's chair, was a paid consultant for most of the major vaccine makers and shares a patent on a measles vaccine with Merck, which also manufactures the hepatitis B vaccine. Dr. Neal Halsey, another committee member, worked as a researcher for the vaccine companies and received honoraria from Abbott Labs for his research on the hepatitis B vaccine.
Indeed, in the tight circle of scientists who work on vaccines, such conflicts of interest are common. Rep. Burton says that the CDC "routinely allows scientists with blatant conflicts of interest to serve on intellectual advisory committees that make recommendations on new vaccines," even though they have "interests in the products and companies for which they are supposed to be providing unbiased oversight." The House Government Reform Committee discovered that four of the eight CDC advisors who approved guidelines for a rotavirus vaccine laced with thimerosal "had financial ties to the pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0616-31.htm

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Vacate, posted 10-12-2007 12:00 AM Vacate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Vacate, posted 10-12-2007 1:16 AM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 308 (427566)
10-12-2007 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by molbiogirl
10-11-2007 11:15 PM


Re: Deborah Ray
mobiogirl writes:
If you would be so kind as to provide the cites, I would be more than happy to look into these clinical studies.
However, since you have not chosen to share these mysterious cites in other threads, I'm not gonna hold my breath.
That said, I'm willing to bet big $$$ that these "studies" were published in "journals" like The Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine.
Wanna put your money where your mouth is?
Talk is cheap. I don't take notes on Deborah Ray. My wife does, but she doesn't follow the studies. I do know that Ray and Whitaker have both cited Harvard studies in the past and other studies outside of the naturopaths as well as naturopath studies. You would loose on your wager and I'm not out to impoverish you to any degree.
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by molbiogirl, posted 10-11-2007 11:15 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by molbiogirl, posted 10-12-2007 1:18 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 308 (427760)
10-12-2007 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Wounded King
10-12-2007 2:30 AM


Numbers Mixed Up
You're right Wounded. Thanks for pointing that out. I had the numbers backwards. Make that 1 in 2500 before to 1 in 120 present.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Wounded King, posted 10-12-2007 2:30 AM Wounded King has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 308 (427770)
10-12-2007 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Vacate
10-12-2007 1:16 AM


Vacate writes:
Don't you consider it important that these injections have saved people? I know of one person with autism even though everyone I know has been immunized.
1. Unknown is how many of the saved people developed medical problems, diseases and died of effects related to the mercury in the vaccines.
2. Unknown is how many would have died or become infirm without the vaccines.
3. Unknown is how many would have been able to ward off diseases like polio had the medical methodology been to prevent by building up the imune system and eliminating a lot of junk food full of white flour and white sugar etc.
4. KNOWN is that likely many of those who were disabled and/or died would not have contacted polio in the first place had DDT and other dangerous pesticides had not been used since the increase in the use of the pesticides coincided with the increase of polio. It is also known that the number of polio decreased dramatically when DDT was banned. DDT has a half life of about one year.
5. KNOWN also is the fact that the symptoms of DDT poisoning and polio are quite similar, raising the question as to whether the alleged polio epidemic was actually a DDT poisoning event.
A link to support the above knowns is as follows. I suggest a read of this study for enlightment on this subject, especially noting the visual graphs.
Pesticides and Polio:
A Critique of Scientific Literature
"Early in 1949, as a result of studies during the previous year, the author published reports implicating DDT preparations in the syndrome widely attributed to a 'virus-X' in man, in 'X-disease' in cattle and in often fatal syndromes in dogs and cats. The relationship was promptly denied by government officials, who provided no evidence to contest the author's observations but relied solely on the prestige of government authority and sheer numbers of experts to bolster their position. . . .
"['X-disease'] . . . studied by the author following known exposure to DDT and related compounds and over and over again in the same patients, each time following known exposure. We have described the syndrome as follows: . . . . In acute exacerbations, mild clonic convulsions involving mainly the legs, have been observed. Several young children exposed to DDT developed a limp lasting from 2 or 3 days to a week or more. . . .
"Simultaneously with the occurrence of this disorder [X-disease], a number of related changes occurred in the incidence of known diseases. The most striking of these is poliomyelitis. In the United States the incidence of polio had been increasing prior to 1945 at a fairly constant rate, but its epidemiologic characteristics remained unchanged. Beginning in 1946, the rate of increase more than doubled. Since then remarkable changes in the character of the disease have been noted. Contrary to all past experience, the disease has remained epidemic year after year."
Pesticides and Polio: A Critique of Scientific Literature - The Weston A. Price Foundation
Note that the "X-disease" term is used since the unknown is whether the symptoms were viral or chemical related. Either coincidently or purposely, the DDT was banned about the time the vaccine campaign began. The mysterious unknown there is whether the vaccine just happened to be introduced at a time when suspicion was rising about the government allowing the poisoning of the citizenry via $$ chemicals or whether both the ban and the vaccine coming on the scene simultaneosly was coincidenta. I suspect $$$ and a political fly in the ointment.
From my personal childhood experience, in retrospect it was about the age I had my vaccines at school that I became allergic to a number of things and developed hay fever whereas until about that age I had no symptoms of hay fever. Thanks to wholistic knowledge about bolstering the immune system my hay fever has been less intense but I must be careful with diet during the grass polination. Unknown, of course is whether there is a connection with the hay fever and the mercury and other toxins in the vaccines or whether both occured coincidently. My mother developed MS about the time the DDT and polio graphs began to rise simultaneosly, eventually to become totally disabled having suffered with the disease for some 40 years. Was there a DDT connection? About the time she was diagnosed my Dad bought a ranch were he sprayed the alfalfa with DDT in Wyoming. He was a rancher for a number of years while her disease progressed. Of course she, like the rest of the population consumed fruits and vegetables having been sprayed with DDT. My Dad also used it on some of his garden produce.
Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Vacate, posted 10-12-2007 1:16 AM Vacate has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 308 (427861)
10-13-2007 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by Percy
10-13-2007 8:43 AM


Re: Mercury in Children
Percy writes:
I'd like to echo Molbiogirl's request that you focus on the evidence and not on charges of bias and lack of honesty.
Percy, you're assuming from your and Mobiogirl's POV that there is no lack of honesty on the part of the $$ and control/power interest in conventional healthcare when in fact that has been shown not to be the case time and time again. To disallow the honesty factor from this debate is to lend undue advantage to your POV and your side of the debate.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Percy, posted 10-13-2007 8:43 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 10-13-2007 11:36 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 55 by molbiogirl, posted 10-13-2007 4:47 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 308 (427939)
10-13-2007 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by molbiogirl
10-13-2007 4:50 PM


Hang In There, LindaLou!
Mobiogirl writes:
If you say you are going to leave, then leave.
LindaLou, STICK TO YOUR GUNS! Their big problem is that you're scoring for the wrong side. I'm with you until I'm convinced that their charges are valid. If they see fit to throw me out justifiably defending you, so be it!

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by molbiogirl, posted 10-13-2007 4:50 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-13-2007 5:50 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 63 by molbiogirl, posted 10-13-2007 6:47 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 66 by nator, posted 10-13-2007 8:15 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 68 by Kitsune, posted 10-14-2007 3:14 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 308 (427940)
10-13-2007 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Percy
10-13-2007 11:36 AM


Re: Response Error
Percy, my apologies. I hurriedly clicked on message 3 thinking it was in this thread instead of reading the rest of the sentence. When I got there It still didn't realize I was in a different thread. My response toMessage 3: is in that thread and I don't know whether it should be moved or left as is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Percy, posted 10-13-2007 11:36 AM Percy has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 308 (427942)
10-13-2007 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Kitsune
10-13-2007 4:40 AM


Re: Mercury in Children
LindaLou writes:
Quackwatch. Self-confessed skeptic sites. These kinds of sites have the agenda of "debunking" alt med in all of its forms. The kind of information they give is going to reflect that bias and I would not trust them to be honest or to include all the facts.
You have the ability to find a study yourself and comment on it. Why not do this, instead of trusting these sources to do it accurately for you?
This is true. You and I who've actually participated in the wholistic regime for years know it by experience. They are the skeptics who've never tried/tested the effectiveness of naturopath.
They are the ones who think they know what we've lived and tested. They are the ones who don't listen to and studiously study up on the science of naturopathy. They are the ones who's methodology supports the receiving end of the $$ driven bias relative to healthcare.
What is being ignored by our counterparts is that in these debates we do support our significant points with links which support them, just as they do for their agenda. If we were to count up all of the messages from all debate participants which do not contain evidence perse within the given message, likely there would be at least an equal number of bare comment on both sides of the debate.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Kitsune, posted 10-13-2007 4:40 AM Kitsune has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 308 (427944)
10-13-2007 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by molbiogirl
10-13-2007 4:47 PM


Re: Take it to the appropriate thread
Since my message was a response to Percy's in this thread you are implicating Percy as well as me. What is your solution to that? Should we then as administrators suspend one another?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by molbiogirl, posted 10-13-2007 4:47 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by molbiogirl, posted 10-13-2007 6:44 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 100 of 308 (428278)
10-15-2007 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by Wounded King
10-15-2007 5:56 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
WK writes:
I'd say there is a whole lot of claim and no way of judging its credibility. There are many very technical assertions and without knowing where they come from, i.e. what research they are based on, it is very hard to evaluate their worth.
The data given such as what Hoot cited should in itself be sufficient enough to back off from pumping multiple questionable chemicals into babies at a crucial stage of development, especially when you apply the logic to the stats which implicate vaccinations with autism.
When these babies are administered chemicals foreign to the natural body ecosystem, crucial vitamins and other nutrients are diminished which must go to work combating these chemicals. It just doesn't make logical science sense.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Wounded King, posted 10-15-2007 5:56 PM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by nator, posted 10-16-2007 9:40 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 308 (428283)
10-15-2007 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by molbiogirl
10-15-2007 6:42 PM


Re: There is no link between autism and vaccines
mobiogirl writes:
One. Thimerosal has been in vaccines since 1928.
Two. The rate of autism disgnosis has risen dramatically since it was recognized in 1943.
Why didn't autism rates skyrocket between 1943 and 1978 (the site you linked to said 1/10,000 in 1978 and 1/700 now)?
It would depend on how many shots were administered per capita in the years beginning 1928 all the way until the present, at what ages the shots were administered, when did they begin shooting multiple shots into 18 month children etc, etc. My understanding is that the incidence of autism began to spike up relative to the increase in vaccinating, especially with young children. My understanding is that there has been a steady rise in the numbers of new vaccinations administered which are likely several dozen by the time they're in kindegarten.
The more the pharm fatcats can invent to pump into the kiddies the more the $$$ for them, the researchers and the docs who administer them which imo is the bottom line. The $$$ are significant enough to trump the safety factor. Had all this expense and effort been concentrated on prevention, health education, whole body health and safe natural remedies to disease, we would all be sooo much better off.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 6:42 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 9:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 104 of 308 (428286)
10-15-2007 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by jar
10-15-2007 8:04 PM


Re: Playing with mercury
jar writes:
Growing up mercury was a favorite play toy. Everyone loved it and almost everybody had some. We would rub pennies in it and drop it on the floor then work the drops back together again, squeeze it between our fingers, just generally have fun with it.
1. We all did that back then when it was not known how dangerous it can be. We did likely have reactions but didn't know it was the mercury that gave us the headache, flu, hay fever or whatever.
2. Which is more dangerous, handling it with your fingers on relatively rare occasions or having it pumped into your blood multiple times during your developing years as a child by a doc and packing it into your mouth by a dentist?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by jar, posted 10-15-2007 8:04 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by jar, posted 10-15-2007 8:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 106 by crashfrog, posted 10-15-2007 8:39 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 108 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2007 9:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 109 by molbiogirl, posted 10-15-2007 9:42 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 122 by nator, posted 10-16-2007 9:42 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024