Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

On Kinds... again.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Kinds... again.
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 2 of 63 (63282)
10-29-2003 8:19 AM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
10-29-2003 5:02 AM

Amazing folks, those ancient, goat-herding baraminologists. Two different kinds of owl, yet beetles, it appears, are all one kind. So a kind could be anything from a genus to a whole order!
​
As you are no doubt aware, creationists are in a Catch-22. If a kind is a small unit, they won’t all fit on the ark; if it is a large unit, so they can fit on board, then heaps of ‘microevolution’ is required after the flood to create modern biodiversity.
​
They will doubtless say that there is a balance there somewhere. I’ll consider it when see it.
​
Cheers, DT
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 10-29-2003 5:02 AM Dr Jack has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by mendy, posted 10-31-2003 10:42 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
 Message 42 by mendy, posted 11-03-2003 10:22 PM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 3 of 63 (63283)
10-29-2003 8:21 AM

I’m also very curious what a flying creeping thing with four feet is. Anyone know?
Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Primordial Egg, posted 10-29-2003 8:29 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
 Message 8 by Brian, posted 10-31-2003 7:27 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
 Message 14 by mendy, posted 10-31-2003 10:48 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied
  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 6 of 63 (63315)
10-29-2003 12:34 PM 		Reply to: Message 5 by Mespo
10-29-2003 11:47 AM

Re: Flying Creeping Thing
Nah, bats are birds, apparently (fowl of the air, iirc, can't remember the verse).
​
DT
This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Mespo, posted 10-29-2003 11:47 AM Mespo has not replied
  
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 49 of 63 (64326)
11-04-2003 5:29 AM 		Reply to: Message 12 by Dr Jack
10-31-2003 9:35 AM

Bat skeleton
Mr Jack wrote, a while back:
quote:
Er, yes. I'm aware of that but I couldn't find a picture to illustrate my point as well as yours does.
A bit late I'm afraid, but here's one of my favourite pics
to show creationists:
​
​
I think it's "kinda neat", as the colonials might say.
Certainly no sign of homologies there...
​
Cheers, DT
​
attempts to fix page width - The Queen
​
[This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 11-04-2003]
​
[This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 11-04-2003]
This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Dr Jack, posted 10-31-2003 9:35 AM Dr Jack has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024