Rapid generation of layers in the GC

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
I know I'm annoying all of you with (i) my claim and (ii) my occasional incorrect usage of terms. I apologise on point (ii). On point (i) all I can say is that I think it explains the geolgocial column better than your answer.

---

That remains to be seen! http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=11&t=19&p=7 post 16 please.Schraf has started a thread re fossil plants http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=page&f=11&t=17&p=7 , & their appearance in the fossil record, a subject I championed some months back. This is an issue that creationists/noachian floodists need to address.Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
Thanks Quetzal. You do realize that your 2nd and 3rd papers you link refer to only single Cenozoic epochs? But I'll check them out for info on how the layers go there - thanks. We really don't have the big problem you guys think we do with soils. The flood occurred in surges and washed soils from higher regions step by step. So we get soils washed down and layering at different levels with each surge.

---

And the established soil horizons that multiple trees are rooted in?Why do some of them have burrows if they are catastrophicall transported?Mark------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

​

[This message has been edited by mark24, 05-22-2002]