|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: rat mothers | |||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2201 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: What about a zygote that doesn't have a brain?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
If she had aborted me, I would never have existed to think about it, would I? I didn't ask you that, so I do not know why you answered that.
It would explain a lot of things. I will pray for that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
What about a zygote that doesn't have a brain? Technically and brain dead person, doesn't have one either. What would be the reason for that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Yeah, because having an abortion is so much fun that I have gotten preganant 13 or 14 times just because I LOVE having abortions! So, to you it IS a regretable action, I knew it.There is hope for you yet Then we'd better start putting hundreds of thousands of girls and women in prison, or executing them, for premeditated, first degree murder then, correct? That includes your girlfriend, and you, too, as an accessory to murder. If it was illegal.
I thought you said that life begins at conception, not implantation. Which is it? Conception. Good morning to you, have a nice day schraf.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2201 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: So, do you suggest that we ban all birth control methods, such as IUD's, which prevent implantation of the fertilized eggs? Likewise, since most fertilized eggs never implant and are flushed out of the body, do you suggest that we collect and search the menstrual discharge of all females in search of this "precious life" so it can be saved and implanted into a waiting uterus?
quote: It is a regrettable thing to have an abortion. I know of no pro-choice person who thinks otherwise. But I disagree that an early-term abortion aborts a baby. It's not a baby yet. No more than the millions of fertilized eggs that are flushed out with the menstruation discharge of millions of women all over the world are babies.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2201 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
Then we'd better start putting hundreds of thousands of girls and women in prison, or executing them, for premeditated, first degree murder then, correct? That includes your girlfriend, and you, too, as an accessory to murder. quote: I mean, it's so obvious that having an abortion is exactly the same as walking up to a 4 year old child and shooting him or her in the head, right? If it's murder, it should be illegal, right? And those murduring whores should rot in prison or die for killing their babies, right?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
docpotato Member (Idle past 5078 days) Posts: 334 From: Portland, OR Joined: |
This is a fact. People who want to have a baby, are absolutly changed when that precious moment happens. Great! People who want babies aren't generally out there having abortions once they know they might have a baby. I'm sure there are exceptions. Now: How do people who don't want babies feel when this precious moment happens? Are they generally super happy? Absolutely changed?
It's all about selfishness. It's a regretable action to abort a baby. I would respect everyone more, if they would just admit that. Well, cross me off your respect list. I don't think abortion is inherently regrettable. I think it can be a good thing. Besides, if you want to talk about selfishness, I think having a baby is more selfish than aborting one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I would really respect all of those who are for abortion much more if they would just admit that life begins at inception Silly. Of course life begins when it begin, its quite tautalogical. All you are implying here is that I'd respect pro choicers, if they'd agree with me. Which is silly.
and the real reason they want abortions is so that they don't have suffer for their mistakes. Highly silly. You make the mistake of putting in people's minds the stereotype image of the pro-lifer. Self-righteous in their morality they want to laud it over those immoral sluts who should 'suffer' (presumably their child should also suffer) for their indescretions, and abortion isn't suffering enough. What's the good in being holier-than-thou if you don't get to rub your hands in glee at those poor misguided souls that can't control their biological urges, unlike us pro-lifers who can. It's very very silly to put that vision in your opponents heads because they aren't going to be persuaded by any of your rational arguments if they think that your real motivation behind being pro-life is to punish the lascivious. Its kind of like slamming your brakes on when you have a tailgater, so that they can suffer the consequences of bad driving. Wouldn't it be far more productive (and less silly) to try and talk drivers in general around to a better understanding of road safety?
It is plainly obvious that with a sperm enters an egg, it is a precious moment that starts life. Perhaps you might call it life - but then so is bacteria, which we regularly slay for our own convenience. Oops, I was careless and I cut myself with a rusty nail. Should I be made to suffer the consequences? After all I have now provided a veritable 'womb'/wound for a whole colony of bacteria to dwell. That bacteria might one day evolve into intelligent life, so I have a dilemma, suffer with an infection or kill the bacteria. This kind of thing is the at the root of the debate, and you talk as if the matter were settled in your favour and everyone should simply see that. Why is it obvious that it is a precious moment? Are you just going to assert that it is so and that should be enough? Its plainly obvious that the world was created 3.14159265 billion years ago be the Thetans and that abortion is sanctioned by W'Fvet of Kraal.
It's all about selfishness. It's a regretable action to abort a baby. I would respect everyone more, if they would just admit that. Have you paid attention to the pro-choicers at all, or have you simply been arguing past them? This appears to be very silly. Of course it is regrettable to abort a baby, on a number of levels. I'm sure there are some out there that don't give it a second thought, but I've met none. Even those that don't 'regret' having an abortion generally regret that the decision had to be made at all. Personally, I think it is a lot less silly to try and understand the opinions of your opponents in such debates, and try to come to an understanding with them. I lost interest in the abortion debate a long while back because I understood the other side's position, decided it had no merit (once peeled back, it was mainly appeals to emotion) and that was the end of it. If you are going down the path I think you are going down, you are going to have to show some logic behind the concept of life in and of itself is precious (but only in humans). You'll have to show why a unique sequence of chemicals is something special. Simply making emotive assertions about how plainly obvious it is is not going to persuade anyone, and telling people that you would respect them more if only they would agree with you...is silly
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
After all, each one is a potential life. I don't think so. It takes the right combinations of events, a one in a million chance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Of course life begins when it begin, its quite tautalogical. Way to be unspecific, and safe.
All you are implying here is that I'd respect pro choicers, if they'd agree with me. Which is silly. I did not imply that, I implied what I said.
those immoral sluts who should 'suffer' (presumably their child should also suffer) for their indescretions, You are assuming everyone will suffer.
and abortion isn't suffering enough. Why is it suffering, if it's not life?
What's the good in being holier-than-thou For the umpteenth time, it has nothing to do with God.
if you don't get to rub your hands in glee at those poor misguided souls that can't control their biological urges, unlike us pro-lifers who can. I rebuke that, we are all the same.
It's very very silly to put that vision in your opponents heads You deduced that all on your own, must be a problem you have.It's really very simple what I am saying, at least argue the point. Its kind of like slamming your brakes on when you have a tailgater, so that they can suffer the consequences of bad driving. OH yea!!!
Wouldn't it be far more productive (and less silly) to try and talk drivers in general around to a better understanding of road safety? Are they liberal or conservative? But seriously, that is another sore subject with me, the driving test.
Perhaps you might call it life - but then so is bacteria, This is the last time I will say it, bacteris is not human life, and never will be human life. Where's all those silly little logic statements when it comes to this?
Oops, I was careless and I cut myself with a rusty nail. Oops I was careless and got popped? ???? Sex is an accident your saying.
That bacteria might one day evolve into intelligent life Let me off this ride right now.
This kind of thing is the at the root of the debate, Not even close. You can justify it all you want, but it is what it is. Sound the trumpets!!! Victory is at hand!!!
try to come to an understanding with them. After that last statement, we are in understanding.
If you are going down the path I think you are going down, you are going to have to show some logic behind the concept of life in and of itself is precious Why don't you do it? You can start by explaining why it is a regretable action.
You'll have to show why a unique sequence of chemicals is something special. I have.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kalimero Member (Idle past 2475 days) Posts: 251 From: Israel Joined: |
There is no difference between interupting life in the womb, as interupting life of say a 5 year old.
You still havent defined what exactly it is that you see as life, and please dont use {examples/anecdotes}, just say what it is.Then base it on a scientific fact that can differentiate a zygote from any other diploid cell in our body. The second a sperm makes it in.
Is that before or after nuclii merging? What if only half of the chromosomes merge and the other half stay wraped in some of the nuclear membrane, is THAT a baby?
Isn't that what people who want a baby so bad and can't have one (in some cases) pay big bucks for? Isn't that the magic moment?
You obviously know nothing about embryology. The answer is: there is no "magic moment", conscience is a progressivly building function. It builds up from nothing to full conscienceness (there are also semi-conscience states {dreaming, under mild anasthesia, exc.}).
There are people who jump off cliffs, and do not wish to get hurt, there are people who drag race, and don't want to die doing it, there are people who shydive, and hope their chutes don't fail.
In the case of a pregnant mother, before conscienceness, its only the mother who takes the risk, just like the drag racer, and wouldnt be great if a drag racer could protect himself from accidents but still keep doing what he loves to do?
But with those examples, they are playing games with their own lives, which is a risk you take. This doesn't stop from whats going to happen, from happening. Then don't mention it, because here I are.
This hypthetical situation shows the difference between the existant 'you', and the hypothetical, non-existant 'you', which would have been the case if your mother would have gotten an abortion. If you still insist that you existed immediately after conseption then answer this - how would you know if your mother had an abortion (know - as it was done or afterward)? (Remember you have no conscience prossesing of external information).
That is not an answer to my question. Abortion promotes unwarranted sex. Hey we can screw all we want, without having any reprocussions!
Thats nonsense - just because there is a cure for polio, doesnt I'm not going to avoid it (quite literally) like the plague. By you logic we should also remove seat belts becuase they promote bad driving.
We lose all respect for life, and the process that got us here when we do things like this.
I think your the one thats lost respect for life if you think that mothers will be happy having unwanted babies (it happens) and babies having unwanting mothers (even more terrible).
But on the other hand, the only good reason I have heard so far for making abortion legal is that people will get abortions anyway, and they will be much worse if it's not legal.
You mean like weed. Thats a terrible reson for doing it. I would illegalize all substances that cause a major kind of adiction and harm (including alcohol and tabbaco).
So where in the pregnancy do you draw the line?
Like I said: conscience is a progressivly building function, so the best I can do is draw a line where I know that the fetus is definitly not conscience. But as to the question of where the line realy is - by the article I'v read either nobody knows or/and it shifts from person to person.
What to you is the gift of life?
"gift of life"? Whats that, more emotionaly charged rhetoric?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Great! People who want babies aren't generally out there having abortions once they know they might have a baby. I'm sure there are exceptions. Why?
Now: How do people who don't want babies feel when this precious moment happens? Are they generally super happy? No.
Absolutely changed?
Yes.
I think having a baby is more selfish than aborting one. No it's not, Your saying I kill innocent helpless babies because I care. It's all about correcting a "mistake". But it's not a mistake when you get pregnant, if you intentionally have sex.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 447 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
You still havent defined what exactly it is that you see as life, and please dont use {examples/anecdotes}, just say what it is. About a million times now.
Then base it on a scientific fact that can differentiate a zygote from any other diploid cell in our body. Scientific fact:A diploid cell will never be anything more when left alone. A zygote will. So let's drop that comparison ok?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kalimero Member (Idle past 2475 days) Posts: 251 From: Israel Joined: |
About a million times now.
Can you give a link to that?
Scientific fact:
You obviously have no scientific training.A diploid cell will never be anything more when left alone. A zygote will. A zygote IS a diploid cell, but under specific conditions - lack of genetic inhibitors, is positioned in a supporting environment ext' - if you where to take any cell and put it in those conditions, it WOULD become a baby. Its called totipotency: Cell potency - Wikipedia (the differecne between a regular cell and a stem cell are various genetic inhibitors).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
kalimero Member (Idle past 2475 days) Posts: 251 From: Israel Joined: |
I don't think so.
And yet women seem to get pregnant more often then that - intersting! Besides, even if it were a 1 in a million chance (though I dont understand where you got that from) it would still be a potential life.
It takes the right combinations of events, a one in a million chance.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024