Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   'Modeling' recent debates using chess
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 7 of 70 (95245)
03-27-2004 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by DNAunion
03-27-2004 9:13 PM


I beat Nigel Short once.
In US rating system I was about 2400.
Don't play much anymore. Last time was about a year ago.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by DNAunion, posted 03-27-2004 9:13 PM DNAunion has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by DNAunion, posted 03-27-2004 10:42 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 9 of 70 (95654)
03-29-2004 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by DNAunion
03-27-2004 10:42 PM


Ratings
Ok I should be more clear. I had a BCF rating of 239. This translates roughly to an ELO of around 2400.
I believe currently USCF ratings are inflated about 120 points compared to FIDE.
No I am not an IM though that was about my level in 1985 or so. I was the two time runner up in the British University Chess Tournament.
I played Nigel Short in a 'friendly' game or two about 1981 or so, a friend of mine went to high schol with him. We are only about 3 days apart in age - so we were 16 at the time. He seems to have faded a little recently but he was up to about 2725 I believe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by DNAunion, posted 03-27-2004 10:42 PM DNAunion has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Percy, posted 03-29-2004 12:58 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied
 Message 11 by DNAunion, posted 03-29-2004 10:26 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 13 of 70 (95896)
03-30-2004 8:41 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by DNAunion
03-29-2004 10:26 PM


Reply
DNAunion,
I must admit I would be interested to know my current chess ability. I have only played a few games in the last decade or so. The most recent was with a grad student of a colleague of mine. He had a USCF rating of 2250 or so (= 2100+ FIDE). I beat him rather easily - but I would hazard that I would be no more than 2350 myself right now.
Tell me - do you play online?
I never have but I am told it is becoming a farce because people will sit there and run a program like Fritz and pretend it is them playing. A program like that for $60 plays at what - about 2400-2600?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by DNAunion, posted 03-29-2004 10:26 PM DNAunion has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by DNAunion, posted 03-30-2004 10:11 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 19 of 70 (96467)
03-31-2004 7:54 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by DNAunion
03-30-2004 10:40 PM


Re:
You ever play the grob or spike to mess with people. It's good playing for money with people who don't know you because they think you are an idiot.
By the way I hate blitz but I agree it removes the cheating with good chess software.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by DNAunion, posted 03-30-2004 10:40 PM DNAunion has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by berberry, posted 03-31-2004 8:11 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied
 Message 21 by DNAunion, posted 03-31-2004 9:30 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 30 of 70 (96664)
04-01-2004 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Percy
04-01-2004 2:43 PM


Short mate.
[text=white]1. g4 f5
2. f3 Qh4 ++[/text]
Hid the solution. Problem wasn't for EC or DU. Or does this imply there's an even shorter one I don't know about? --Admin
[This message has been edited by Admin, 04-01-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Percy, posted 04-01-2004 2:43 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Eta_Carinae, posted 04-01-2004 8:17 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 33 of 70 (96755)
04-01-2004 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Eta_Carinae
04-01-2004 3:38 PM


Re: Short mate.
If you read the previous post to my blanked out solution I was told I could go ahead and post it.
Dope!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Eta_Carinae, posted 04-01-2004 3:38 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 36 of 70 (96786)
04-01-2004 9:52 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by DNAunion
04-01-2004 9:26 PM


Re: Chess Puzzle
I feel left out.
Here's one I just thought about. Though I think I may have dug it up out of memory so it may not be original.
(PS I am doing this in my head so apologies if an error - but I am sure I think - lol)
White:
pawns h2 b3
rooks b7 f1
knight e4
queen f2
king h1
Black:
pawns a5 g5 d4
rooks e3 d8
bishops e7 e8
knight h6
queen h3
king g8
White to move and mate in 3.
Have fun!!!
It's actually pretty easy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by DNAunion, posted 04-01-2004 9:26 PM DNAunion has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by DNAunion, posted 04-01-2004 10:16 PM Eta_Carinae has replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 38 of 70 (96803)
04-01-2004 10:22 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by DNAunion
04-01-2004 10:16 PM


Re: Chess Puzzle
I don't care - post away.
It is rather easy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by DNAunion, posted 04-01-2004 10:16 PM DNAunion has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by DNAunion, posted 04-01-2004 10:39 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4404 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 59 of 70 (97518)
04-03-2004 2:18 PM


Calm down guys.
No disrespect but really guys, people with ratings in the 1700-1800 range should not be arguing chess as though you were Kasparov, Polgar, Anand, Leko, Kramnik, Adams etc etc.
As I have alluded to earlier I don't play anymore but it seems to me that arguing on the internet over chess puzzles seems moot when you realise a strong PC chess game will solve these puzzles. You don't know if the person is doing it or their $50 software.
If you are any good you should be able to solve these puzzles in your head without a board in front of you. (Well maybe not 16 move mates - but certainly the 3 move mates.)
Relax guys.

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by DNAunion, posted 04-03-2004 2:53 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied
 Message 61 by DNAunion, posted 04-03-2004 4:28 PM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024