Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wyatt's Museum and the shape of Noah's Ark
Sylas
Member (Idle past 5290 days)
Posts: 766
From: Newcastle, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2002


Message 19 of 303 (100779)
04-18-2004 9:46 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by mike the wiz
04-17-2004 6:35 PM


mike the wiz writes:
your link writes:
In our opinion Ron is either fraudulent or delusional.
I don't think such things are necessary, even if he was way off with his claims.
I think such things are necessary. This is not a blanket claim made about creationists or creationism, but about one specific individual (since deceased); whom I think was mostly likely a cynically deliberate career huxster.
Frauds, hoaxers, and conmen exist; and it is right and proper that they be exposed.
It is not a good idea to respond to stuff like what Ron Wyatt provided as if it is worthy of serious examination or as if this is about an honest disagreement on evidence.
Cheers -- Sylas

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by mike the wiz, posted 04-17-2004 6:35 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by johnfolton, posted 04-19-2004 1:26 AM Sylas has not replied

Sylas
Member (Idle past 5290 days)
Posts: 766
From: Newcastle, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2002


Message 22 of 303 (100875)
04-19-2004 6:21 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by crashfrog
04-19-2004 1:53 AM


crashfrog writes:
whatever writes:
Its obvious you have rock sediments from the biblical deluge that could of flowed around the ark, and into the ark, over time, preserving the ark as a grassy meadow.
Remember though that the deluge was over when Noah's ark came to rest. What you consider flood sediments would have largely solidified by the time the ark sat down to disgorge its manifest.
So, no. The flood sediments wouldn't have done any flowing, as near as I can tell.
Hey crash; you've missed the true charm of this bit of lunacy. Whatever's post was supported by a reference to Noah's Ark Overview, Pt. II at a site dedicated to Wyatt's "discoveries". And yet, that site says:
The ark originally came to rest higher on the mountain after the Flood. At some point in the first two thousand years of resting in the mountains of Ararat, a volcano erupted above the ark and moved the ark further down the mountain and then impaled it on a rock outcropping where it rests today.
So which is it, whatever? Did Ron get this bit wrong?
Cheers -- Sylas

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by crashfrog, posted 04-19-2004 1:53 AM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by johnfolton, posted 04-19-2004 10:49 AM Sylas has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024