Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Geologic Column
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 4 of 68 (4325)
02-12-2002 11:09 PM


Ah, another opportunity to push one of my favorite introductions to the geologic thought process:
Radiometric Dating and the Geological Time Scale
Circular Reasoning or Reliable Tools?
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dating.html
It serves up a fine indroduction, leading up to radiometric dating considerations.
Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by KingPenguin, posted 02-12-2002 11:16 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 33 of 68 (4466)
02-14-2002 12:17 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Percy
02-13-2002 5:33 PM


Changing views of the history of the Earth
http://www.tiac.net/users/cri/geohist.html
This is a page, of which the link was given in the page I linked to in message 4. It better answers the question of message 1 of this string.
Moose
Added by edit, for whatever it's worth (from the Geology Glossary of this site:
Geologic column: A diagram representing divisions of geologic time and the rock units formed during each major period.
Geologic time scale: The time scale determined by the geologic column and by radiometric dating of rocks.
------------------
BS degree, geology, '83
Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Old Earth evolution - Yes
Godly creation - Maybe
[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 02-14-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Percy, posted 02-13-2002 5:33 PM Percy has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 39 of 68 (4524)
02-14-2002 7:25 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by redstang281
02-14-2002 3:52 PM


Note that most of the references at the bottom of redstang281's list (which was from http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-307.htm ), are from respected scientific journals. These are published papers that are obviously exploring situations where there are problems with radiometric dating methods. Blatantly NOT efforts at a cover up.
I quote from the end of the paper I cited back in message 4 ( http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dating.html ):
quote:
For potential critics: Refuting the conventional geological time scale is not an exercise in collecting examples of the worst samples possible. A critique of conventional geologic time scale should address the best and most consistent data available, and explain it with an alternative interpretation, because that is the data that actually matters to the current understanding of geologic time.
Moose
------------------
BS degree, geology, '83
Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Old Earth evolution - Yes
Godly creation - Maybe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by redstang281, posted 02-14-2002 3:52 PM redstang281 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024