Why not here (re: Joe's geomagnetism web page)

this is just a small side point,Loud, how does one "know" what is "ad hoc" if one accepts a dual model approach to science C or E. I suppose if one used the duality to polarize ones model,tradition,paradigm or pedagogy then what is ad hoc would be clear but I find the most information on c/e comes from looking at BOTH models together. That is why we have c/e webs of links but no c/e school depts as of yet so either I answered my own question or you could say a little better what criteria or means one uses to "discern" what is ad hoc and what is not to be added?

I didnt say you had to follow the double model of creation and evolution but I indicated that it may in fact be a result of the Dualism that Matchette noted results from a combined Newtonianism and Cartesianism. You do not need to follow that either on a fact by fact basis if you dont want. I would not recommend that however.